RE: [PATCH 4/4 v3] GPIO: gpio-dwapb: Suspend & Resume PM enabling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Fri, 12 Sep 2014, Chen, Alvin wrote:

> > On Tue, 9 Sep 2014, Weike Chen wrote:
> > 
> > >
> > >  struct dwapb_gpio;
> > > +struct dwapb_context;
> > >
> > >  struct dwapb_gpio_port {
> > >  	struct bgpio_chip	bgc;
> > >  	bool			is_registered;
> > >  	struct dwapb_gpio	*gpio;
> > > +	struct dwapb_context	*ctx;
> > 
> > Alvin,
> > 
> > Will this build if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not defined?
> Actually, PM_SLEEP is always set as 'y' in 'kerne/power/Kconfig'. But I manually change it to 'n', this module can be compiled correctly.
> You may be concern with 'ctx', and you can see 'ctx' accessing is always in CONFIG_PM_SLEEP.

Yes and in the case of 'struct dwapb_context *ctx;' it is ok for struct 
dwapb_context to be an incomplete type since that's just a pointer.

Alan 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]
  Powered by Linux