On 12/04/2022 12:41, Tudor.Ambarus@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>>>
>
> I've just noticed that there are other node names that can be fixed,
> if you feel like resubmitting:
> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91rm9200ek.dts: mtd_dataflash@0 {
> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91rm9200ek.dts: nor_flash@10000000 {
> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9260ek.dts: mtd_dataflash@1 {
> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9261ek.dts: mtd_dataflash@0 {
> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9263ek.dts: mtd_dataflash@0 {
> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9g20ek_common.dtsi: mtd_dataflash@1 {
> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9m10g45ek.dts: mtd_dataflash@0 {
> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91sam9rlek.dts: mtd_dataflash@0 {
These are not the same bindings, but I can fix them as well (separate
patch I guess?).
Best regards,
Krzysztof
