Re: [Patch v6 3/4] dt-bindings: memory: Update reg maxitems for tegra186

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On 4/12/2022 3:58 AM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments


On 4/11/22 18:41, Ashish Mhetre wrote:


On 4/11/2022 8:59 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments


On 4/11/22 18:02, Ashish Mhetre wrote:


On 4/10/2022 7:51 PM, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
External email: Use caution opening links or attachments


06.04.2022 08:24, Ashish Mhetre пишет:
            memory-controller@2c00000 {
                compatible = "nvidia,tegra186-mc";
-            reg = <0x0 0x02c00000 0x0 0xb0000>;
+            reg = <0x0 0x02c00000 0x0 0x10000>,    /* MC-SID */
+                  <0x0 0x02c10000 0x0 0x10000>,    /* Broadcast
channel */
+                  <0x0 0x02c20000 0x0 0x10000>,    /* MC0 */
+                  <0x0 0x02c30000 0x0 0x10000>,    /* MC1 */
+                  <0x0 0x02c40000 0x0 0x10000>,    /* MC2 */
+                  <0x0 0x02c50000 0x0 0x10000>;    /* MC3 */
+            reg-names = "mc-sid", "mc-broadcast", "mc0", "mc1",
"mc2", "mc3";

The "mc-" prefix feels redundant to me, I'd name the regs like this:

     "sid", "broadcast", "ch0", "ch1", "ch2", "ch3"


You should also add validation of the regs/reg-names to the yaml based
on SoC version. I.e. it's not enough to only bump the maxItems.

Okay, I will add validation of reg-names as following:

    reg-names:
      minItems: 0
      maxItems: 6
      items:
        - const: sid
        - const: broadcast
        - const: ch0
        - const: ch1
        - const: ch2
        - const: ch3


We will have to keep minItems to 0 in order to make it compatible with
old DT, right?

Bindings are about the latest DTs. In general older dtbs must be updated
and you must get error from the schema checker for older DTs. It's only
drivers that should care about older dtbs.

On v5 Krzysztof mentioned that old DTS will start failing with new
bindings https://lkml.org/lkml/2022/3/22/907.
So I just wanted to confirm whether it's fine if updated bindings
start to fail with old DTS?

Since the older DT was incorrect, it's fine that the DT check will fail
for it.

Thanks for confirming Dmitry. I will incorporate all comments and send
v7.



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux