On 10.04.22 at 19:18, Lukas Wunner wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 01:18:49PM +0200, Lino Sanfilippo wrote:
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/char/tpm/tpm_tis_spi_slb9670.c
> [...]
>> +int slb9670_spi_unset_reset(struct tpm_tis_data *data)
> [...]
>> +int slb9670_spi_set_reset(struct tpm_tis_data *data)
> [...]
>> +static const struct tpm_tis_phy_ops slb9670_spi_phy_ops = {
>> + .read_bytes = tpm_tis_spi_read_bytes,
>> + .write_bytes = tpm_tis_spi_write_bytes,
>> + .read16 = tpm_tis_spi_read16,
>> + .read32 = tpm_tis_spi_read32,
>> + .write32 = tpm_tis_spi_write32,
>> + .set_reset = slb9670_spi_set_reset,
>> + .unset_reset = slb9670_spi_unset_reset,
>> +};
>
> 0-day is complaining that slb9670_spi_set_reset() / slb9670_spi_unset_reset()
> are not declared static:
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/202204081357.8SfjQosI-lkp@xxxxxxxxx/
>
> Thanks,
>
> Lukas
>
Right, I will fix this in the next version, thanks!
Regards,
Lino
