On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 01:04:23PM +0800, Xu Yilun wrote: > On Thu, Apr 07, 2022 at 04:36:56PM +0300, Ivan Bornyakov wrote: > > > > ... snip ... > > > > @@ -148,12 +149,10 @@ static int fpga_mgr_write_init_buf(struct fpga_manager *mgr, > > int ret; > > > > mgr->state = FPGA_MGR_STATE_WRITE_INIT; > > - if (!mgr->mops->initial_header_size) > > - ret = fpga_mgr_write_init(mgr, info, NULL, 0); > > - else > > - ret = fpga_mgr_write_init( > > - mgr, info, buf, min(mgr->mops->initial_header_size, count)); > > + if (mgr->mops->initial_header_size) > > + count = min(mgr->mops->initial_header_size, count); > > > > + ret = fpga_mgr_write_init(mgr, info, buf, count); > > Here we pass the whole buffer for write_init(). Maybe it works for mapped buf, > but still doesn't work for sg buf. > > It is also inefficient if we change to map and copy all sg buffers just for > write_init(). > > We could discuss on the solution. > > My quick mind is we introduce an optional fpga_manager_ops.parse_header() > callback, and a header_size (dynamic header size) field in > fpga_image_info. FPGA core starts with mapping a buf of initial_header_size > for parse_header(), let the drivers decide the dynamic header_size. > > The parse_header() could be called several times with updated dynamic > header_size, if drivers doesn't get enough buffer for final decision and > return -EAGAIN. > > Then write_init() be called with the final dynamic header size. > > For mapped buffer, just passing the whole buffer for write_init() is > fine. > Ok, that's sounds reasonable. Should we pass PAGE_SIZE of a buffer to the parse_header() if initial_header_size is not set? The other option would be to make initial_header_size to be mandatory for usage of parse_header(). > > > > ... snip ... > > > > @@ -98,6 +101,8 @@ struct fpga_image_info { > > struct sg_table *sgt; > > const char *buf; > > size_t count; > > + size_t bitstream_start; > > How about we name it header_size? > > > + size_t bitstream_size; > > And how about data_size? > Sure, I don't mind.