Hi Liang,
liang.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote on Sat, 2 Apr 2022 15:49:19 +0800:
> EMMC and NAND have the same clock control register named 'SD_EMMC_CLOCK' which is
> defined in EMMC port internally. bit0~5 of 'SD_EMMC_CLOCK' is the divider and
> bit6~7 is the mux for fix pll and xtal.A common MMC and NAND sub-clock has been
> implemented and can be used by the eMMC and NAND controller (which are mutually
> exclusive anyway). Let's use this new clock.
>
> Signed-off-by: Liang Yang <liang.yang@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c | 89 +++++++++++++++----------------
> 1 file changed, 42 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> index ac3be92872d0..1b1a9407fb2f 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/raw/meson_nand.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
> #include <linux/dma-mapping.h>
> #include <linux/interrupt.h>
> #include <linux/clk.h>
> +#include <linux/clk-provider.h>
> #include <linux/mtd/rawnand.h>
> #include <linux/mtd/mtd.h>
> #include <linux/mfd/syscon.h>
> @@ -19,6 +20,7 @@
> #include <linux/iopoll.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> #include <linux/of_device.h>
> +#include <linux/of_address.h>
> #include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
>
> #define NFC_REG_CMD 0x00
> @@ -104,6 +106,9 @@
>
> #define PER_INFO_BYTE 8
>
> +#define CLK_DIV_SHIFT 0
> +#define CLK_DIV_WIDTH 6
> +
> struct meson_nfc_nand_chip {
> struct list_head node;
> struct nand_chip nand;
> @@ -151,15 +156,15 @@ struct meson_nfc {
> struct nand_controller controller;
> struct clk *core_clk;
> struct clk *device_clk;
> - struct clk *phase_tx;
> - struct clk *phase_rx;
> + struct clk *nand_clk;
> + struct clk_divider nand_divider;
>
> unsigned long clk_rate;
> u32 bus_timing;
>
> struct device *dev;
> void __iomem *reg_base;
> - struct regmap *reg_clk;
> + void __iomem *sd_emmc_clock;
> struct completion completion;
> struct list_head chips;
> const struct meson_nfc_data *data;
> @@ -235,7 +240,7 @@ static void meson_nfc_select_chip(struct nand_chip *nand, int chip)
> nfc->timing.tbers_max = meson_chip->tbers_max;
>
> if (nfc->clk_rate != meson_chip->clk_rate) {
> - ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->device_clk, meson_chip->clk_rate);
> + ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->nand_clk, meson_chip->clk_rate);
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to set clock rate\n");
> return;
> @@ -406,7 +411,6 @@ static int meson_nfc_queue_rb(struct meson_nfc *nfc, int timeout_ms)
> cmd = NFC_CMD_RB | NFC_CMD_RB_INT
> | nfc->param.chip_select | nfc->timing.tbers_max;
> writel(cmd, nfc->reg_base + NFC_REG_CMD);
> -
Please avoid these spacing changes in the middle of a commit.
> ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&nfc->completion,
> msecs_to_jiffies(timeout_ms));
> if (ret == 0)
> @@ -985,9 +989,11 @@ static const struct mtd_ooblayout_ops meson_ooblayout_ops = {
> .free = meson_ooblayout_free,
> };
>
> +struct clk_parent_data nfc_divider_parent_data[1];
> static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc *nfc)
> {
> int ret;
> + struct clk_init_data init = {0};
>
> /* request core clock */
> nfc->core_clk = devm_clk_get(nfc->dev, "core");
> @@ -1002,21 +1008,26 @@ static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc *nfc)
> return PTR_ERR(nfc->device_clk);
> }
>
> - nfc->phase_tx = devm_clk_get(nfc->dev, "tx");
> - if (IS_ERR(nfc->phase_tx)) {
> - dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to get TX clk\n");
> - return PTR_ERR(nfc->phase_tx);
> - }
> -
> - nfc->phase_rx = devm_clk_get(nfc->dev, "rx");
> - if (IS_ERR(nfc->phase_rx)) {
> - dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to get RX clk\n");
> - return PTR_ERR(nfc->phase_rx);
> - }
> + init.name = devm_kstrdup(nfc->dev, "nfc#div", GFP_KERNEL);
> + init.ops = &clk_divider_ops;
> + nfc_divider_parent_data[0].fw_name = "device";
> + init.parent_data = nfc_divider_parent_data;
> + init.num_parents = 1;
> + nfc->nand_divider.reg = nfc->sd_emmc_clock;
> + nfc->nand_divider.shift = CLK_DIV_SHIFT;
> + nfc->nand_divider.width = CLK_DIV_WIDTH;
> + nfc->nand_divider.hw.init = &init;
> + nfc->nand_divider.flags = CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED |
> + CLK_DIVIDER_ROUND_CLOSEST |
> + CLK_DIVIDER_ALLOW_ZERO;
> +
> + nfc->nand_clk = devm_clk_register(nfc->dev, &nfc->nand_divider.hw);
> + if (IS_ERR(nfc->nand_clk))
> + return PTR_ERR(nfc->nand_clk);
>
> /* init SD_EMMC_CLOCK to sane defaults w/min clock rate */
> - regmap_update_bits(nfc->reg_clk,
> - 0, CLK_SELECT_NAND, CLK_SELECT_NAND);
> + writel(CLK_SELECT_NAND | readl(nfc->sd_emmc_clock),
> + nfc->sd_emmc_clock);
>
> ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->core_clk);
> if (ret) {
> @@ -1030,29 +1041,21 @@ static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc *nfc)
> goto err_device_clk;
> }
>
> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->phase_tx);
> + ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->nand_clk);
> if (ret) {
> - dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to enable TX clock\n");
> - goto err_phase_tx;
> + dev_err(nfc->dev, "pre enable NFC divider fail\n");
> + goto err_nand_clk;
> }
>
> - ret = clk_prepare_enable(nfc->phase_rx);
> - if (ret) {
> - dev_err(nfc->dev, "failed to enable RX clock\n");
> - goto err_phase_rx;
> - }
> -
> - ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->device_clk, 24000000);
> + ret = clk_set_rate(nfc->nand_clk, 24000000);
Is this rename really useful?
> if (ret)
> - goto err_disable_rx;
> + goto err_disable_clk;
>
> return 0;
>
> -err_disable_rx:
> - clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_rx);
> -err_phase_rx:
> - clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_tx);
> -err_phase_tx:
> +err_disable_clk:
> + clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->nand_clk);
> +err_nand_clk:
> clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->device_clk);
> err_device_clk:
> clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->core_clk);
> @@ -1061,8 +1064,7 @@ static int meson_nfc_clk_init(struct meson_nfc *nfc)
>
> static void meson_nfc_disable_clk(struct meson_nfc *nfc)
> {
> - clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_rx);
> - clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->phase_tx);
> + clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->nand_clk);
> clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->device_clk);
> clk_disable_unprepare(nfc->core_clk);
> }
> @@ -1374,7 +1376,6 @@ static int meson_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> struct meson_nfc *nfc;
> - struct resource *res;
> int ret, irq;
>
> nfc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*nfc), GFP_KERNEL);
> @@ -1388,21 +1389,15 @@ static int meson_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> nand_controller_init(&nfc->controller);
> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nfc->chips);
> init_completion(&nfc->completion);
> -
Please don't modify spacing in this commit.
> nfc->dev = dev;
>
> - res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
> - nfc->reg_base = devm_ioremap_resource(dev, res);
> + nfc->reg_base = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "nfc");
This change seems unrelated.
> if (IS_ERR(nfc->reg_base))
> return PTR_ERR(nfc->reg_base);
>
> - nfc->reg_clk =
> - syscon_regmap_lookup_by_phandle(dev->of_node,
> - "amlogic,mmc-syscon");
> - if (IS_ERR(nfc->reg_clk)) {
> - dev_err(dev, "Failed to lookup clock base\n");
> - return PTR_ERR(nfc->reg_clk);
> - }
> + nfc->sd_emmc_clock = devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "emmc");
> + if (IS_ERR(nfc->sd_emmc_clock))
> + return PTR_ERR(nfc->sd_emmc_clock);
While I agree this is much better than the previous solution, we cannot
break DT compatibility, so you need to try getting the emmc clock, but
if it fails you should fallback to the regmap lookup.
>
> irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
> if (irq < 0)
Thanks,
Miquèl
