Hi Matthias, * Thanks for the reviews. On Thu, 2022-03-31 at 13:01 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote: > > On 30/03/2022 12:04, Jason-JH Lin wrote: > > Hi CK, > > > > Thanks for the review. > > > > On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 13:39 +0800, CK Hu wrote: > > > Hi, Jason: > > > > > > On Mon, 2022-03-28 at 13:03 +0800, Jason-JH Lin wrote: > > > > Hi CK, > > > > > > > > Thanks for the reviews. > > > > > > > > On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 11:28 +0800, jason-jh.lin wrote: > > > > > Add mt8195 vdosys0 clock driver name and routing table to > > > > > the driver data of mtk-mmsys. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: jason-jh.lin <jason-jh.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > Acked-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno < > > > > > angelogioacchino.delregno@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > Impelmentation patch of vdosys1 can be refered to [1] > > > > > > > > > > [1] soc: mediatek: add mtk-mmsys support for mt8195 vdosys1 > > > > > --- > > > > > drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h | 130 > > > > > +++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > > > > drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c | 11 +++ > > > > > include/linux/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h | 9 ++ > > > > > 3 files changed, 150 insertions(+) > > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h > > > > > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h > > > > > b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h > > > > > new file mode 100644 > > > > > index 000000000000..24a3afe23bc8 > > > > > --- /dev/null > > > > > +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,130 @@ > > > > > +/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only */ > > > > > + > > > > > +#ifndef __SOC_MEDIATEK_MT8195_MMSYS_H > > > > > +#define __SOC_MEDIATEK_MT8195_MMSYS_H > > > > > + > > > > > +#define MT8195_VDO0_OVL_MOUT_EN > > > > > > > > > > 0xf14 > > > > > +#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL0_TO_DISP_RDMA0 > > > > > BIT(0) > > > > > +#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL0_TO_DISP_WDMA0 > > > > > BIT(1) > > > > > > > > > > Useless, so remove. > > > > > > > > > > +#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL0_TO_DISP_OVL1 > > > > > BIT(2) > > > > > Ditto.Useless, so remove. > > > > > Regards, > > > > > CK > > > > > > > > Although these definitions are not used, they represent the > > > > functionality provided by this register. > > > > > > > > I think we can show that we have these capabilities by defining > > > > them. > > > > > > > > Can we keep these definitions? > > > > > > It's better that we know how to use it. Even though the symbol > > > name > > > show some information, but I would like to add it to > > > mmsys_mt8195_routing_table[]. > > > > > > Regards, > > > CK > > > > > > > OK, I think I just remove the useless define. > > Actually I would prefer to add it to the routing table to describe > all the > capabilities of the HW. > > Is there any technical problem with that? > > Regards, > Matthias > OK, I'll add keep these definitions and add them to the routing table. Regards, Jason-JH.Lin > > Thanks. > > > > Regards, > > Jason-JH.Lin > > > > > > > > Regards, > > > > Jason-JH.Lin > > > > > > > > > +#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL1_TO_DISP_RDMA1 > > > > > BIT(4) > > > > > +#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL1_TO_DISP_WDMA1 > > > > > BIT(5) > > > > > +#define MT8195_MOUT_DISP_OVL1_TO_DISP_OVL0 > > > > > BIT(6) > > > > > > > > > > > > [snip] > > > > > > > > > > -- Jason-JH Lin <jason-jh.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
