On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 at 19:03, Sankeerth Billakanti
<quic_sbillaka@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> The interrupt register will still reflect the connect and disconnect
> interrupt status without generating an actual HW interrupt.
> The controller driver should not handle those masked interrupts.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sankeerth Billakanti <quic_sbillaka@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c
> index 3c16f95..1809ce2 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dp/dp_catalog.c
> @@ -608,13 +608,14 @@ u32 dp_catalog_hpd_get_intr_status(struct dp_catalog *dp_catalog)
> {
> struct dp_catalog_private *catalog = container_of(dp_catalog,
> struct dp_catalog_private, dp_catalog);
> - int isr = 0;
> + int isr, mask;
>
> isr = dp_read_aux(catalog, REG_DP_DP_HPD_INT_STATUS);
> dp_write_aux(catalog, REG_DP_DP_HPD_INT_ACK,
> (isr & DP_DP_HPD_INT_MASK));
> + mask = dp_read_aux(catalog, REG_DP_DP_HPD_INT_MASK);
>
> - return isr;
> + return isr & (DP_DP_HPD_STATE_STATUS_MASK | mask);
I suspect that the logic is inverted here. Shouldn't it be:
return isr & DP_DP_HPD_STATE_STATUS_MASK & mask;
?
> }
>
> int dp_catalog_ctrl_get_interrupt(struct dp_catalog *dp_catalog)
> --
> 2.7.4
>
--
With best wishes
Dmitry
