On Tue, 09 Sep 2014, Opensource [Adam Thomson] wrote:
> On August 28, 2014 12:47, Varka Bhadram wrote:
>
> > On 08/28/2014 04:18 PM, Adam Thomson wrote:
> >
> > (...)
> >
> > > +static int da9150_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
> > > + const struct i2c_device_id *id)
> > > +{
> > > + struct da9150 *da9150;
> > > + int ret;
> > > +
> > > + da9150 = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(struct da9150), GFP_KERNEL);
> > > + if (da9150 == NULL)
> > > + return -ENOMEM;
> >
> > da9150 = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*da9150), GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!da9150)
> > return -ENOMEM;
>
> Ok, no real difference, but can change it.
Not functionally, but we like to do things as succinctly as possible.
--
Lee Jones
Linaro STMicroelectronics Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
