At 2014-09-04 02:04:24, "Mike Turquette" <mturquette@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >Quoting Chao Xie (2014-08-25 21:38:14) >> From: Chao Xie <chao.xie@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> The register used by clk-frac may be shared with >> other clocks. >> So it needs to use spin lock to protect the register >> access. >> >> Signed-off-by: Chao Xie <chao.xie@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >This patch will break against the latest clk-next due to api changes. >You can see more here[0] and use this script to update your code if you >like[1]. > >Basically the calls to clk_set_rate need to be changed to >clk_provider_set_rate. > I see the patch set [0] is V10 now, and it is not merged to clk-next yet. So should i wait for the patch set to be merged, then send out the updated patches? >[0] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1409758148-20104-1-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >[1] http://cgit.collabora.com/git/user/tomeu/linux.git/commit/?h=clk-refactoring-9&id=ea48c0d655346cce26329523cf24574f9ea8feee > >Regards, >Mike ?韬{.n?壏煯壄?%娝?檩?w?{.n?壏漽鴾z谵{?洝塄}财爖?j:+v墾 畐娻2娹櫒璀??摺玜囤?z夸z罐楘+凒殠娸?w棹f
