Dear Krzysztof, Thanks for your comments. Pardon me for my late reply. On Mon, 2022-03-07 at 22:42 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 07/03/2022 13:25, Tim Chang wrote: > > add devicetree binding of mtk cci devfreq on MediaTek SoC. > > Start with capital letter. Sure, I will update it for the whole series in next version. > > > > > Signed-off-by: Jia-Wei Chang < > > jia-wei.chang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > This does not match your From. Please fix this in all your > submissions. Sure, I will update it for the whole series in next version. > > > --- > > .../devicetree/bindings/devfreq/mtk-cci.yaml | 73 > > +++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 73 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/mtk- > > cci.yaml > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/mtk-cci.yaml > > b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/mtk-cci.yaml > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..e64ac4c56758 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/devfreq/mtk-cci.yaml > > @@ -0,0 +1,73 @@ > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) > > +%YAML 1.2 > > +--- > > +$id: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://devicetree.org/schemas/devfreq/mtk-cci.yaml*__;Iw!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!2apx_16V_XMrl28ae1aDO3-2WFga3xJiACU_40mgGydrumBmFuHcQFpW_LnX6DHny5Zpig$ > > > > +$schema: > > https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml*__;Iw!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!2apx_16V_XMrl28ae1aDO3-2WFga3xJiACU_40mgGydrumBmFuHcQFpW_LnX6DEPqkDN4g$ > > > > + > > +title: Mediatek Cache Coherent Interconnect (CCI) Devfreq driver > > Device Tree Bindings > > Similarly to your other patches - the title describes hardware. > Please > fix it in all your submissions of all your series. Sure, I will fix them in the next version. > > Remove "driver Device Tree Bindings". "Devfreq" is Linuxism, so this > maybe "bus frequency scaling"? Although later you call the device > node > as cci. Should I use "Binding for MediaTek's Cache Coherent Interconnect (CCI) frequency and voltage scaling" as new title? > > > + > > +maintainers: > > + - Jia-Wei Chang <jia-wei.chang@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > + > > +description: | > > + This module is used to create CCI DEVFREQ. > > + The performance will depend on both CCI frequency and CPU > > frequency. > > + For MT8186, CCI co-buck with Little core. > > + Contain CCI opp table for voltage and frequency scaling. > > Half of this description (first and last sentence) does not describe > the > actual hardware. Please describe hardware, not driver. Sure, I will fix it in the next version. > > > + > > +properties: > > + compatible: > > + const: "mediatek,mt8186-cci" > > No need for quotes. Sure, I will fix it in the next version. > > > + > > + clocks: > > + items: > > + - description: > > + The first one is the multiplexer for clock input of CPU > > cluster. > > + - description: > > + The other is used as an intermediate clock source when > > the original > > + CPU is under transition and not stable yet. > > + > > + clock-names: > > + items: > > + - const: "cci" > > + - const: "intermediate" > > No need for quotes. Sure, I will fix it in the next version. > > > + > > + operating-points-v2: > > + description: > > + For details, please refer to > > + Documentation/devicetree/bindings/opp/opp-v2.yaml > > + > > + opp-table: true > > Same comments as your CPU freq bindings apply. mtk-cci-devfreq is a new driver and its arch is same as mediatek- cpufreq so that the properties of mtk-cci are refer to mediatek-cpufreq bindings. operating-point-v2 is used to determine the voltage and frequency of dvfs which is further utilized by mtk-cci-devfreq. > > > + > > + proc-supply: > > + description: > > + Phandle of the regulator for CCI that provides the supply > > voltage. > > + > > + sram-supply: > > + description: > > + Phandle of the regulator for sram of CCI that provides the > > supply > > + voltage. When present, the cci devfreq driver needs to do > > + "voltage tracking" to step by step scale up/down Vproc and > > Vsram to fit > > + SoC specific needs. When absent, the voltage scaling flow is > > handled by > > + hardware, hence no software "voltage tracking" is needed. > > + > > +required: > > + - compatible > > + - clocks > > + - clock-names > > + - operating-points-v2 > > + - proc-supply > > + > > +additionalProperties: false > > + > > +examples: > > + - | > > + #include <dt-bindings/clock/mt8186-clk.h> > > + cci: cci { > > Node names should be generic and describe type of device. Are you > sure > this is a CCI? Maybe "interconnect" suits it better? Yes, this is a CCI and it is generic type of device like CPU in my opinion. If my understanding is correct, CCI is more suitable. > > > + compatible = "mediatek,mt8186-cci"; > > + clocks = <&mcusys CLK_MCU_ARMPLL_BUS_SEL>, <&apmixedsys > > CLK_APMIXED_MAINPLL>; > > + clock-names = "cci", "intermediate"; > > + operating-points-v2 = <&cci_opp>; > > + proc-supply = <&mt6358_vproc12_reg>; > > + sram-supply = <&mt6358_vsram_proc12_reg>; > > + }; > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof
