On Tue, Mar 15, 2022 at 01:27:48AM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote: > > I think it can. I vaguely remember seeing conditional clauses based on > > compatible strings in other yaml bindings. > > > > I started a new binding document because I expected adding significant > > additions to the existing .txt files would be rejected. If I get some > > cycles I could look at converting the existing docs from txt to yaml. > > > > I'm not sure that there will be much in the way of a common > > mvebu-pinctrl.yaml as you'd end up repeating most of the common stuff to > > make things conditional anyway. > > We should wait for Rob to comment. But is suspect you are right, there > will not be much savings. It's always a judgement call of amount of if/then schema vs. duplicating the common parts. If it's the function/pin parts that vary, then that's probably best as separate schema for each case. Otherwise, I'm not sure without seeing something. Rob
