On 21/03/2022 16:14, Ansuel Smith wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 04:41:37PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 21/03/2022 15:48, Ansuel Smith wrote:
>>> Convert kpss-gcc driver Documentation to yaml.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> .../bindings/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-gcc.txt | 44 ------------
>>> .../bindings/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-gcc.yaml | 68 +++++++++++++++++++
>>> 2 files changed, 68 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-)
>>> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-gcc.txt
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-gcc.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-gcc.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-gcc.txt
>>> deleted file mode 100644
>>> index e628758950e1..000000000000
>>> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-gcc.txt
>>> +++ /dev/null
>>> @@ -1,44 +0,0 @@
>>> -Krait Processor Sub-system (KPSS) Global Clock Controller (GCC)
>>> -
>>> -PROPERTIES
>>> -
>>> -- compatible:
>>> - Usage: required
>>> - Value type: <string>
>>> - Definition: should be one of the following. The generic compatible
>>> - "qcom,kpss-gcc" should also be included.
>>> - "qcom,kpss-gcc-ipq8064", "qcom,kpss-gcc"
>>> - "qcom,kpss-gcc-apq8064", "qcom,kpss-gcc"
>>> - "qcom,kpss-gcc-msm8974", "qcom,kpss-gcc"
>>> - "qcom,kpss-gcc-msm8960", "qcom,kpss-gcc"
>>> -
>>> -- reg:
>>> - Usage: required
>>> - Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
>>> - Definition: base address and size of the register region
>>> -
>>> -- clocks:
>>> - Usage: required
>>> - Value type: <prop-encoded-array>
>>> - Definition: reference to the pll parents.
>>> -
>>> -- clock-names:
>>> - Usage: required
>>> - Value type: <stringlist>
>>> - Definition: must be "pll8_vote", "pxo".
>>> -
>>> -- clock-output-names:
>>> - Usage: required
>>> - Value type: <string>
>>> - Definition: Name of the output clock. Typically acpu_l2_aux indicating
>>> - an L2 cache auxiliary clock.
>>> -
>>> -Example:
>>> -
>>> - l2cc: clock-controller@2011000 {
>>> - compatible = "qcom,kpss-gcc-ipq8064", "qcom,kpss-gcc";
>>> - reg = <0x2011000 0x1000>;
>>> - clocks = <&gcc PLL8_VOTE>, <&gcc PXO_SRC>;
>>> - clock-names = "pll8_vote", "pxo";
>>> - clock-output-names = "acpu_l2_aux";
>>> - };
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-gcc.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-gcc.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..20ee182eb16f
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-gcc.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-gcc.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: Krait Processor Sub-system (KPSS) Global Clock Controller (GCC)
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> + - Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> +
>>> +description: |
>>> + Krait Processor Sub-system (KPSS) Global Clock Controller (GCC). Used
>>> + to control L2 mux (in the current implementation).
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> + compatible:
>>> + items:
>>> + - enum:
>>> + - qcom,kpss-gcc-ipq8064
>>> + - qcom,kpss-gcc-apq8064
>>> + - qcom,kpss-gcc-msm8974
>>> + - qcom,kpss-gcc-msm8960
>>> + - const: qcom,kpss-gcc
>>> +
>>> + reg:
>>> + maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> + clocks:
>>> + items:
>>> + - description: phandle to pll8_vote
>>> + - description: phandle to pxo_board
>>> +
>>> + clock-names:
>>> + items:
>>> + - const: pll8_vote
>>> + - const: pxo
>>> +
>>> + clock-output-names:
>>> + const: acpu_l2_aux
>>> +
>>> + '#clock-cells':
>>> + const: 0
>>> +
>>> +required:
>>> + - compatible
>>> + - reg
>>> + - clocks
>>> + - clock-names
>>> + - clock-output-names
>>> + - '#clock-cells'
>>
>> You add here a new required property, so this is not a pure conversion.
>> Please explain in the commit msg why are you doing this. I asked about
>> this in your previous patchset.
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Krzysztof
>
> Sorry I probably missed it. Just to make sure you are referring to
> #clock-cells?
> Since this expose a clock, clock-cells is required. Should I put this in
> a different commit?
Yeah, clock-cells. It's enough to mention it in commit msg.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
