On Tue, 2022-03-22 at 16:08 +0800, Chunfeng Yun wrote:
> On Tue, 2022-03-22 at 10:47 +0800, Jianjun Wang wrote:
> > Add PCIe GEN3 PHY driver support on MediaTek chipsets.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/phy/mediatek/Kconfig | 11 ++
> > drivers/phy/mediatek/Makefile | 1 +
> > drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-pcie.c | 271
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 3 files changed, 283 insertions(+)
> > create mode 100644 drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-pcie.c
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/mediatek/Kconfig
> > b/drivers/phy/mediatek/Kconfig
> > index 55f8e6c048ab..387ed1b3f2cc 100644
> > --- a/drivers/phy/mediatek/Kconfig
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/mediatek/Kconfig
> > @@ -55,3 +55,14 @@ config PHY_MTK_MIPI_DSI
> > select GENERIC_PHY
> > help
> > Support MIPI DSI for Mediatek SoCs.
> > +
> > +config PHY_MTK_PCIE
> > + tristate "MediaTek PCIe-PHY Driver"
> > + depends on ARCH_MEDIATEK || COMPILE_TEST
> > + depends on OF
> > + select GENERIC_PHY
> > + help
> > + Say 'Y' here to add support for MediaTek PCIe PHY driver.
> > + This driver create the basic PHY instance and provides
> > initialize
> > + callback for PCIe GEN3 port, it supports software efuse
> > + initialization.
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/mediatek/Makefile
> > b/drivers/phy/mediatek/Makefile
> > index ace660fbed3a..788c13147f63 100644
> > --- a/drivers/phy/mediatek/Makefile
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/mediatek/Makefile
> > @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
> > obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_MTK_TPHY) += phy-mtk-tphy.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_MTK_UFS) += phy-mtk-ufs.o
> > obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_MTK_XSPHY) += phy-mtk-xsphy.o
> > +obj-$(CONFIG_PHY_MTK_PCIE) += phy-mtk-pcie.o
> >
> > phy-mtk-hdmi-drv-y := phy-mtk-hdmi.o
> > phy-mtk-hdmi-drv-y += phy-mtk-hdmi-mt2701.o
> > diff --git a/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-pcie.c
> > b/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-pcie.c
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 000000000000..2f19c253238f
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-pcie.c
> > @@ -0,0 +1,271 @@
> > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> > +/*
> > + * Copyright (c) 2022 MediaTek Inc.
> > + * Author: Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > + */
> > +
> > +#include <linux/bits.h>
> > +#include <linux/compiler_types.h>
> > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > +#include <linux/nvmem-consumer.h>
> > +#include <linux/of_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/phy/phy.h>
> > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > +#include <linux/slab.h>
> > +
> > +#include "phy-mtk-io.h"
> > +
> > +#define PEXTP_ANA_GLB_00_REG 0x9000
> > +#define PEXTP_ANA_LN0_TRX_REG 0xa000
> > +#define PEXTP_ANA_TX_OFFSET 0x04
> > +#define PEXTP_ANA_RX_OFFSET 0x3c
> > +#define PEXTP_ANA_LANE_OFFSET 0x100
> > +
> > +/* PEXTP_GLB_00_REG[28:24] Internal Resistor Selection of TX Bias
> > Current */
> > +#define EFUSE_GLB_INTR_SEL GENMASK(28, 24)
> > +#define EFUSE_GLB_INTR_VAL(x) ((0x1f & (x)) << 24)
> > +
> > +/* PEXTP_ANA_LN_RX_REG[3:0] RX impedance selection */
> > +#define EFUSE_LN_RX_SEL GENMASK(3, 0)
> > +#define EFUSE_LN_RX_VAL(x) (0xf & (x))
> > +
> > +/* PEXTP_ANA_LN_TX_REG[5:2] TX PMOS impedance selection */
> > +#define EFUSE_LN_TX_PMOS_SEL GENMASK(5, 2)
> > +#define EFUSE_LN_TX_PMOS_VAL(x) ((0xf & (x)) << 2)
> > +
> > +/* PEXTP_ANA_LN_TX_REG[11:8] TX NMOS impedance selection */
> > +#define EFUSE_LN_TX_NMOS_SEL GENMASK(11, 8)
> > +#define EFUSE_LN_TX_NMOS_VAL(x) ((0xf & (x)) << 8)
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * struct mtk_pcie_lane_efuse - eFuse data for each lane
> > + * @tx_pmos: TX PMOS impedance selection data
> > + * @tx_nmos: TX NMOS impedance selection data
> > + * @rx_data: RX impedance selection data
> > + * @lane_efuse_supported: software eFuse data is supported for
> > this
> > lane
> > + */
> > +struct mtk_pcie_lane_efuse {
> > + u32 tx_pmos;
> > + u32 tx_nmos;
> > + u32 rx_data;
> > + bool lane_efuse_supported;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * struct mtk_pcie_phy_data - phy data for each SoC
> > + * @num_lanes: supported lane numbers
> > + * @sw_efuse_supported: support software to load eFuse data
> > + */
> > +struct mtk_pcie_phy_data {
> > + int num_lanes;
> > + bool sw_efuse_supported;
> > +};
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * struct mtk_pcie_phy - PCIe phy driver main structure
> > + * @dev: pointer to device
> > + * @phy: pointer to generic phy
> > + * @sif_base: IO mapped register base address of system interface
> > + * @data: pointer to SoC dependent data
> > + * @sw_efuse_en: software eFuse enable status
> > + * @efuse_glb_intr: internal resistor selection of TX bias current
> > data
> > + * @efuse: pointer to eFues data for each lane
> > + */
> > +struct mtk_pcie_phy {
> > + struct device *dev;
> > + struct phy *phy;
> > + void __iomem *sif_base;
> > + const struct mtk_pcie_phy_data *data;
> > +
> > + bool sw_efuse_en;
> > + u32 efuse_glb_intr;
> > + struct mtk_pcie_lane_efuse *efuse;
> > +};
> > +
> > +static void mtk_pcie_efuse_set_lane(struct mtk_pcie_phy *pcie_phy,
> > + unsigned int lane)
> > +{
> > + struct mtk_pcie_lane_efuse *data = &pcie_phy->efuse[lane];
> > + void __iomem *addr;
> > +
> > + if (!data->lane_efuse_supported)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + addr = pcie_phy->sif_base + PEXTP_ANA_LN0_TRX_REG +
> > + lane * PEXTP_ANA_LANE_OFFSET;
> > +
> > + mtk_phy_update_bits(addr + PEXTP_ANA_TX_OFFSET,
> > EFUSE_LN_TX_PMOS_SEL,
> > + EFUSE_LN_TX_PMOS_VAL(data->tx_pmos));
> > +
> > + mtk_phy_update_bits(addr + PEXTP_ANA_TX_OFFSET,
> > EFUSE_LN_TX_NMOS_SEL,
> > + EFUSE_LN_TX_NMOS_VAL(data->tx_nmos));
> > +
> > + mtk_phy_update_bits(addr + PEXTP_ANA_RX_OFFSET,
> > EFUSE_LN_RX_SEL,
> > + EFUSE_LN_RX_VAL(data->rx_data));
> > +}
> > +
> > +/**
> > + * mtk_pcie_phy_init() - Initialize the phy
> > + * @phy: the phy to be initialized
> > + *
> > + * Initialize the phy by setting the efuse data.
> > + * The hardware settings will be reset during suspend, it should
> > be
> > + * reinitialized when the consumer calls phy_init() again on
> > resume.
> > + */
> > +static int mtk_pcie_phy_init(struct phy *phy)
> > +{
> > + struct mtk_pcie_phy *pcie_phy = phy_get_drvdata(phy);
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + if (!pcie_phy->sw_efuse_en)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + /* Set global data */
> > + mtk_phy_update_bits(pcie_phy->sif_base + PEXTP_ANA_GLB_00_REG,
> > + EFUSE_GLB_INTR_SEL,
> > + EFUSE_GLB_INTR_VAL(pcie_phy-
> > > efuse_glb_intr));
> >
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < pcie_phy->data->num_lanes; i++)
> > + mtk_pcie_efuse_set_lane(pcie_phy, i);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct phy_ops mtk_pcie_phy_ops = {
> > + .init = mtk_pcie_phy_init,
> > + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static int mtk_pcie_efuse_read_for_lane(struct mtk_pcie_phy
> > *pcie_phy,
> > + unsigned int lane)
> > +{
> > + struct mtk_pcie_lane_efuse *efuse = &pcie_phy->efuse[lane];
> > + struct device *dev = pcie_phy->dev;
> > + char efuse_id[15];
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + snprintf(efuse_id, sizeof(efuse_id), "tx_ln%d_pmos", lane);
> > + ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, efuse_id, &efuse-
> > > tx_pmos);
> >
> > + if (ret)
> > + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to read %s\n",
> > efuse_id);
>
> skip this error?
Oh, sorry, I made a mistake, it should be return here, I'll fix it in
the next version, thanks for your review.
Thanks.
>
> > +
> > + snprintf(efuse_id, sizeof(efuse_id), "tx_ln%d_nmos", lane);
> > + ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, efuse_id, &efuse-
> > > tx_nmos);
> >
> > + if (ret)
> > + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to read %s\n",
> > efuse_id);
> > +
> > + snprintf(efuse_id, sizeof(efuse_id), "rx_ln%d", lane);
> > + ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, efuse_id, &efuse-
> > > rx_data);
> >
> > + if (ret)
> > + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to read %s\n",
> > efuse_id);
> > +
> > + if (!(efuse->tx_pmos || efuse->tx_nmos || efuse->rx_data))
> > + dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL,
> > + "No eFuse data found for lane%d, but dts
> > enable it\n",
> > + lane);
> > +
> > + efuse->lane_efuse_supported = true;
>
> Seems efuse->lane_efuse_supported is always true?
> but is false if all these three efuse values are zero, right?
Yes, I'll fix it in the next version, thanks.
>
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int mtk_pcie_read_efuse(struct mtk_pcie_phy *pcie_phy)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = pcie_phy->dev;
> > + bool nvmem_enabled;
> > + int ret, i;
> > +
> > + nvmem_enabled = device_property_read_bool(dev, "nvmem-cells");
> > + if (!nvmem_enabled)
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > + ret = nvmem_cell_read_variable_le_u32(dev, "glb_intr",
> > + &pcie_phy-
> > > efuse_glb_intr);
> >
> > + if (ret)
> > + dev_err_probe(dev, ret, "Failed to read glb_intr\n");
>
> also here, skip the error?
Should be return here, I'll fix it in the next version.
>
> > +
> > + pcie_phy->sw_efuse_en = true;
> > +
> > + pcie_phy->efuse = devm_kzalloc(dev, pcie_phy->data->num_lanes *
> > + sizeof(*pcie_phy->efuse),
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!pcie_phy->efuse)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < pcie_phy->data->num_lanes; i++) {
> > + ret = mtk_pcie_efuse_read_for_lane(pcie_phy, i);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int mtk_pcie_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> > +{
> > + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> > + struct phy_provider *provider;
> > + struct mtk_pcie_phy *pcie_phy;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + pcie_phy = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*pcie_phy), GFP_KERNEL);
> > + if (!pcie_phy)
> > + return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > + pcie_phy->sif_base =
> > devm_platform_ioremap_resource_byname(pdev, "sif");
> > + if (IS_ERR(pcie_phy->sif_base))
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pcie_phy->sif_base),
> > + "Failed to map phy-sif base\n");
> > +
> > + pcie_phy->phy = devm_phy_create(dev, dev->of_node,
> > &mtk_pcie_phy_ops);
> > + if (IS_ERR(pcie_phy->phy))
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(pcie_phy->phy),
> > + "Failed to create PCIe phy\n");
> > +
> > + pcie_phy->dev = dev;
> > + pcie_phy->data = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
> > + if (!pcie_phy->data)
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, -EINVAL, "Failed to get phy
> > data\n");
> > +
> > + if (pcie_phy->data->sw_efuse_supported) {
> > + /*
> > + * Failed to read the efuse data is not a fatal
> > problem,
> > + * ignore the failure and keep going.
> > + */
> > + ret = mtk_pcie_read_efuse(pcie_phy);
> > + if (ret == -EPROBE_DEFER)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + phy_set_drvdata(pcie_phy->phy, pcie_phy);
> > +
> > + provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev,
> > of_phy_simple_xlate);
> > + if (IS_ERR(provider))
> > + return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(provider),
> > + "PCIe phy probe failed\n");
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static const struct mtk_pcie_phy_data mt8195_data = {
> > + .num_lanes = 2,
> > + .sw_efuse_supported = true,
> > +};
> > +
> > +static const struct of_device_id mtk_pcie_phy_of_match[] = {
> > + { .compatible = "mediatek,mt8195-pcie-phy", .data =
> > &mt8195_data },
> > + { },
> > +};
> > +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, mtk_pcie_phy_of_match);
>
> Do we need add a generic compatible which sw_efuse_supported is set
> false? if no need, then pcie driver should handle the case without
> phy
> due to we may use hw auto efuse and do not this driver anymore.
Indeed, I'll add a generic ones in the next version, thanks.
>
>
> > +
> > +static struct platform_driver mtk_pcie_phy_driver = {
> > + .probe = mtk_pcie_phy_probe,
> > + .driver = {
> > + .name = "mtk-pcie-phy",
> > + .of_match_table = mtk_pcie_phy_of_match,
> > + },
> > +};
> > +module_platform_driver(mtk_pcie_phy_driver);
> > +
> > +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("MediaTek PCIe PHY driver");
> > +MODULE_AUTHOR("Jianjun Wang <jianjun.wang@xxxxxxxxxxxx>");
> > +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>
>
