On Tue, 22 Mar 2022 00:15:47 +0100, Ansuel Smith wrote: > Convert kpss-gcc driver Documentation to yaml. Since kpss-gcc expose a > clock add the required '#clock-cells' binding while converting it. > > Signed-off-by: Ansuel Smith <ansuelsmth@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-gcc.txt | 44 ------------ > .../bindings/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-gcc.yaml | 69 +++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 69 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) > delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-gcc.txt > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/msm/qcom,kpss-gcc.yaml > Running 'make dtbs_check' with the schema in this patch gives the following warnings. Consider if they are expected or the schema is incorrect. These may not be new warnings. Note that it is not yet a requirement to have 0 warnings for dtbs_check. This will change in the future. Full log is available here: https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1607962 clock-controller@2011000: '#clock-cells' is a required property arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064-ap148.dt.yaml arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064-rb3011.dt.yaml clock-controller@2011000: compatible:0: 'qcom,kpss-gcc' is not one of ['qcom,kpss-gcc-ipq8064', 'qcom,kpss-gcc-apq8064', 'qcom,kpss-gcc-msm8974', 'qcom,kpss-gcc-msm8960'] arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064-ap148.dt.yaml arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064-rb3011.dt.yaml clock-controller@2011000: compatible:1: 'qcom,kpss-gcc' was expected arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064-ap148.dt.yaml arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064-rb3011.dt.yaml clock-controller@2011000: compatible: ['qcom,kpss-gcc', 'syscon'] is too short arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064-ap148.dt.yaml arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-ipq8064-rb3011.dt.yaml
