On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 10:38:48PM +0800, Jiaxin Yu wrote: > On Mon, 2022-03-21 at 17:21 +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 05:14:08PM +0800, Jiaxin Yu wrote: > > > On Mon, 2022-03-21 at 11:59 +0800, Tzung-Bi Shih wrote: > > > > On Sat, Mar 19, 2022 at 07:41:10PM +0800, Jiaxin Yu wrote: > > > > > @@ -1145,6 +1140,13 @@ static int > > > > > mt8192_mt6359_dev_probe(struct > > > > > platform_device *pdev) > > > > > goto err_speaker_codec; > > > > > } > > > > > > > > > > + headset_codec = of_get_child_by_name(pdev->dev.of_node, > > > > > "mediatek,headset-codec"); > > > > > + if (!headset_codec) { > > > > > + ret = -EINVAL; > > > > > + dev_err_probe(&pdev->dev, ret, "Property > > > > > 'headset_codec' missing or invalid\n"); > > > > > + goto err_headset_codec; > > > > > + } > > > > > > > > (to be neat) Does it have any reason to prevent from using > > > > of_parse_phandle() > > > > but of_get_child_by_name()? > > > > > > "mediatek,headset-codec" is a child node of pdev->dev.of_node, so I > > > use > > > of_get_child_by_name() to get and pass it to > > > snd_soc_of_get_dai_link_codecs(). > > > > "mediatek,platform" and "mediatek,hdmi-codec" are also children of > > pdev->dev.of_node. I guess my question is: why doesn't it also use > > of_parse_phandle() for "mediatek,headset-codec"? Did I > > misunderstand? > > The following is from bindings, "mediatek,speaker-codec" and > "mediatek,headset-codec" are sub nodes of sound but "mediatek,platform" > and "mediatek,hdmi-codec" are the name of properties. So we can't get > the sub node pointer through of_parse_phandle(). > > sound: mt8192-sound { > compatible = "mediatek,mt8192_mt6359_rt1015_rt5682"; > mediatek,platform = <&afe>; > mediatek,hdmi-codec = <&anx_bridge_dp>; > pinctrl-names = "aud_clk_mosi_off", > "aud_clk_mosi_on"; > pinctrl-0 = <&aud_clk_mosi_off>; > pinctrl-1 = <&aud_clk_mosi_on>; > > mediatek,headset-codec { > sound-dai = <&rt5682>; > }; > > mediatek,speaker-codec { > sound-dai = <&rt1015_l>, > <&rt1015_r>; > }; > }; Got it, thanks for the explanation. Will provide my R-b tag in another thread.