On 15/03/22 18:35, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > On Tue, 15 Mar 2022 14:17:40 +1300 Chris Packham wrote: >> This is split off from [1] to let it go in via net-next rather than waiting for >> the rest of the series to land. >> >> [1] - https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=20988&d=nKWw4otBS8no711-ly1FNC4uR0v3LkysRvdxYwm1Rg&u=https%3a%2f%2flore%2ekernel%2eorg%2flkml%2f20220314213143%2e2404162-1-chris%2epackham%40alliedtelesis%2eco%2enz%2f > Patchwork says it doesn't apply cleanly to net-next [1]. > Could you double check? > > [1] https://scanmail.trustwave.com/?c=20988&d=nKWw4otBS8no711-ly1FNC4uR0v3LkysRqx8aF21QQ&u=https%3a%2f%2fgit%2ekernel%2eorg%2fpub%2fscm%2flinux%2fkernel%2fgit%2fnetdev%2fnet-next%2egit%2f Yeah sorry looks like this will clash with 72bb9531162a ("net: mvneta: reorder initialisation"). I'll rebase my branch on top of net-next/master. The logical change is simple enough but I can see why git am would object.
