Am 2022-03-13 01:51, schrieb Andrew Lunn:
diff --git a/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-mscc-miim.c
b/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-mscc-miim.c
index 64fb76c1e395..7773d5019e66 100644
--- a/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-mscc-miim.c
+++ b/drivers/net/mdio/mdio-mscc-miim.c
@@ -158,18 +158,18 @@ static int mscc_miim_reset(struct mii_bus *bus)
{
struct mscc_miim_dev *miim = bus->priv;
int offset = miim->phy_reset_offset;
+ int mask = PHY_CFG_PHY_ENA | PHY_CFG_PHY_COMMON_RESET |
+ PHY_CFG_PHY_RESET;
- ret = regmap_write(miim->phy_regs,
- MSCC_PHY_REG_PHY_CFG + offset, 0x1ff);
+ ret = regmap_write(miim->phy_regs, offset, mask);
Is mask the correct name? It is not being used in the typical way for
a mask.
It is the mask of all the reset bits, see also patch 3/3. Either all
these bits are set or none. Do you have any suggestion? I thought about
adding mask and value for the remap_update_bits() in patch 3/3 but
decided against it, just because it doesn't add any value because
mask and value are the same.
-michael
