On Monday, September 08, 2014 09:26:20 AM Ulf Hansson wrote: > On 8 September 2014 00:13, Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thursday, September 04, 2014 03:52:29 PM Ulf Hansson wrote: > >> From: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> This patch introduces generic code to perform PM domain look-up using > >> device tree and automatically bind devices to their PM domains. > >> > >> Generic device tree bindings are introduced to specify PM domains of > >> devices in their device tree nodes. > >> > >> Backwards compatibility with legacy Samsung-specific PM domain bindings > >> is provided, but for now the new code is not compiled when > >> CONFIG_ARCH_EXYNOS is selected to avoid collision with legacy code. > >> This will change as soon as the Exynos PM domain code gets converted to > >> use the generic framework in further patch. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Tomasz Figa <t.figa@xxxxxxxxxxx> > >> Signed-off-by: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@xxxxxxxxxx> > >> [Ulf:Added attach|detach functions, fixed review comments] > >> Tested-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > However, for this one (and consequently the rest) I need an ACK from the > > people who maintain the bindings. > > These DT bindings have been discussed between Tomasz and devicetree > maintainers previously. So I think there are fine. > > Also, when browsing the mail-archives, I found an ack from Rob Herrring: > http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/2014-March/237989.html > > I realize that I didn't put the DT maintainers on the to-line when > posting this patch, but just the devicetree list. I have now included > them on this reply, but maybe I should repost instead. What do you > think? Are you happy with the above ack from Rob? That should be sufficient, but I wonder why you didn't add it to the patch to start with? Rafael -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
