Hi Sudeep, On Wed, 9 Mar 2022 at 11:50, Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@xxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 11:31:16AM +0000, Mike Leach wrote: > > This is a resend of a patch from some time ago (04/2020)[1] which seems to > > have fallen through the cracks - most likely as last time I mistakenly > > tagged it as dt-bindings: rather than dts: > > > > Quite likely, but I vaguely remember this and I assume the bindings had > on-going discussions at that time. > > > I am planning a release of additional CTI configuration examples, which > > include some for Juno - so this is now needed upstream to support that work. > > > > Patch unchanged, other than a correction to the subject. > > > > That may not work. I haven't tried applying but it would be good to > post it rebasing on -next at this moment or after v5.18-rc1 is released. > I have already sent v5.18 material, so I need to queue this for v5.19. > So preferable post the rebase version at v5.18-rc1 in 2+ weeks time. > We have had some restructuring including the new scmi version of DTB > in the mainline or queued in -next at the moment. > I did check it on coresight/next (5.17-rc3) and it was fine. However re-doing for 5.18 is no problem as anything that depends on it will be on there or later anyway. Will rebase and repost when 5.18-rc1 becomes available. Thanks Mike > Sorry for missing this last time. > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-arm-kernel/20200415201330.15894-1-mike.leach@xxxxxxxxxx/ > > > > > > Mike Leach (1): > > arm64: dts: arm: Juno - add CTI entries to device tree > > > > No need of the cover letter for one patch, just post the patch next time. > > -- > Regards, > Sudeep -- Mike Leach Principal Engineer, ARM Ltd. Manchester Design Centre. UK
