On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 10:57:40PM +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 07/03/2022 21:53, Kuldeep Singh wrote:
> > SPI clock name for pl022 is "sspclk" and not "spiclk".
> > Fix below dtc warning:
> > clock-names:0: 'spiclk' is not one of ['SSPCLK', 'sspclk']
> >
> > Also, update node name to spi instead of ssp to enable spi bindings
> > check.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kuldeep Singh <singh.kuldeep87k@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/integratorap-im-pd1.dts | 4 ++--
> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/integratorap-im-pd1.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/integratorap-im-pd1.dts
> > index d47bfb66d069..ebe938556645 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/integratorap-im-pd1.dts
> > +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/integratorap-im-pd1.dts
> > @@ -178,12 +178,12 @@ uart@200000 {
> > clock-names = "uartclk", "apb_pclk";
> > };
> >
> > - ssp@300000 {
> > + ssp0: spi@300000 {
>
> Is the alias used anywhere? Why adding it?
I added an alias so as not to lose originality. At other places, ssp is
used more specifically for spi controller node and since here I need to
enable bindings check, so I mentioned both.
There are other platforms too which are using the same notation and
personally, I couldn't find any harm in this.
Regards
Kuldeep
