On Mon, Mar 7, 2022 at 2:54 PM Kuldeep Singh <singh.kuldeep87k@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > SPI clock for pl022 is "sspclk" and meanwhile few platforms such as > realview, versatile etc. specify "SSPCLK" as clock name. Even though > bindings checks don't differentiate between the two names still keep > same convention throughout i.e sspclk to align with other platforms. I don't see the point in worrying about this. The binding already allows both. Why? Because I wrote the schema and checked it against all the in tree users. The resulting warnings are what should be fixed in the dts files IMO. What's not warning doesn't need to be fixed. Rob
