Hi,
On Tue, Mar 1, 2022 at 8:23 PM Peng Fan (OSS) <peng.fan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@xxxxxxx>
>
> i.MX93 S401 MU support two interrupts: tx empty and rx full.
>
> - Introduce a new flag IMX_MU_V2_IRQ for the dual interrupt case
> - Update author and Copyright
>
Copyright update is fair.
However, I am not sure adding an extra interrupt warrants
co-authorship, otherwise people submit far bigger changes to drivers.
And you didn't even CC the original author Oleksij Rempel. At least
please seek his ACK.
> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> index 03699843a6fd..4bc59a6cad20 100644
> --- a/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/imx-mailbox.c
....
>
> +/* Please not change TX & RX */
> enum imx_mu_chan_type {
> IMX_MU_TYPE_TX, /* Tx */
> IMX_MU_TYPE_RX, /* Rx */
>
You want to hard-code the values to make it clearer
IMX_MU_TYPE_TX = 0,
IMX_MU_TYPE_RX = 1,
> @@ -536,7 +539,8 @@ static int imx_mu_startup(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> {
> struct imx_mu_priv *priv = to_imx_mu_priv(chan->mbox);
> struct imx_mu_con_priv *cp = chan->con_priv;
> - unsigned long irq_flag = IRQF_SHARED;
> + unsigned long irq_flag = 0;
> + int irq;
> int ret;
>
> pm_runtime_get_sync(priv->dev);
> @@ -551,11 +555,16 @@ static int imx_mu_startup(struct mbox_chan *chan)
> if (!priv->dev->pm_domain)
> irq_flag |= IRQF_NO_SUSPEND;
>
> - ret = request_irq(priv->irq[0], imx_mu_isr, irq_flag,
> - cp->irq_desc, chan);
> + if (priv->dcfg->type & IMX_MU_V2_IRQ) {
> + irq = priv->irq[cp->type];
> + } else {
> + irq = priv->irq[0];
>
Please use some verbose define instead of the magic 0.
Thanks.
