Il 04/03/22 06:26, Jason-JH Lin ha scritto:
Hi Angelo,
Because linux-next has applied these patches:
[v15,04/12] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: dsc: add yaml for mt8195
SoC binding
[v15,05/12] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: merge: add additional prop
for mt8195
[v15,06/12] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: add mt8195 SoC binding for
vdosys0
[v15,03/12] dt-bindings: display: mediatek: disp: split each block to
individual yaml
I'll rebase on the latest linux-next, and then send 1 path + 1 series:
[1] a fix up patch for all dt-schema error in each display dt-bindings
(If Rob wants me to split this patch into separate patches for each
file, then I'll resend it.)
[2] a series of remaining patches of this series
I would appreciate it if you would take the time to send [1] for me.
If you can help me to send [1], please let me know.
Thank you very much ;-)
I will send fixes for [1] later today.
Cheers,
Angelo
Regards,
Jason-JH.Lin
On Thu, 2022-03-03 at 10:31 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
Il 03/03/22 05:25, Jason-JH Lin ha scritto:
Hi Rob,
Thanks for the reviews.
On Wed, 2022-03-02 at 17:50 -0600, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 1:19 AM jason-jh.lin <
jason-jh.lin@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
[snip]
Hello Rob, Jason-JH,
I have just crafted a patch that fixes everything mentioned here,
if it's easier like this, I can either send it for the maintainer(s)
to apply on top, or squash in Jason-JH's original patch.
If you'd like to get my patch, though, I have one question:
this is touching literally all of the YAML files that Jason-JH is
introducing, so, should I send this as one patch per file (which
would be
something around 16 patches) or is just one fixing them all fine?
Cheers,
Angelo
_______________________________________________
Linux-mediatek mailing list
Linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!3tXE3T-t6I2GMILAOHpkTXhrLHwFAQtmhGqTBtKSY2SLWM2qBBMULlM17TtG6VwNR5yn$
