Il 14/02/22 11:13, Jason-JH Lin ha scritto:
Hello Matthias, The DRM parts are all reviewed by Chun-Kuang. Can you spare some time to give us some suggestion for mmsys parts? Or do you think we should separate the driver of mmsys related patches to another series and resend again? Would it be better to combine mmsys related patches from vdosys0 [1] and vdosys1 [2] series? e.g. [v1,0/7] soc: mediatek: mmsys: add mt8195 mmsys support [v1,1/7] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: add power and gce properties [v1,2/7] dt-bindings: arm: mediatek: mmsys: add mt8195 SoC binding [v1,3/7] dt-bindings: reset: mt8195: add vdosys1 reset control bit [v1,4/7] soc: mediatek: mmsys: add mtk-mmsys support for mt8195 vdosys0 [v1,5/7] soc: mediatek: mmsys: add mtk-mmsys support for mt8195 vdosys1 [v1,6/7] soc: mediatek: mmsys: add mtk-mmsys config API for mt8195 vdosys1 [v1,7/7] soc: mediatek: mmsys: modify reset controller for MT8195 vdosys1 --- [1] Add Mediatek Soc DRM (vdosys0) support for mt8195 - https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=608548 [2] Add MediaTek SoC DRM (vdosys1) support for mt8195 - https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=604065 --- Regards, Jason-JH.Lin
Hello everyone, I think that all the drm/mediatek and soc/mediatek patches in this series are safe and ready (and also tested for regressions on older SoCs). Feel free to pick them in your trees. Cheers, Angelo
