On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 2:18 PM Rob Herring <robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Tue, Feb 8, 2022 at 3:15 AM Yifeng Zhao <yifeng.zhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Add the compatible strings for the Naneng combo PHY found on rockchip SoC. > > > > Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Yifeng Zhao <yifeng.zhao@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Signed-off-by: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@xxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > > > Changes in v8: None > > Changes in v7: > > - remove u3otg0_port_en, u3otg1_port_en and pipe_sgmii_mac_sel > > > > Changes in v5: > > - modify description for ssc and ext-refclk > > - remove apb reset > > > > Changes in v4: > > - restyle > > - remove some minItems > > - add more properties > > - remove reset-names > > - move #phy-cells > > - add rockchip,rk3568-pipe-grf > > - add rockchip,rk3568-pipe-phy-grf > > > > Changes in v3: None > > Changes in v2: > > - Fix dtschema/dtc warnings/errors > > > > .../phy/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.yaml | 109 ++++++++++++++++++ > > 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.yaml > > This now fails in linux-next: > > /builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.example.dt.yaml: > syscon@fdc50000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be > fixed: > ['rockchip,rk3568-pipe-grf', 'syscon'] is too short > 'rockchip,rk3568-pipe-grf' is not one of ['rockchip,rk3288-sgrf', > 'rockchip,rk3568-usb2phy-grf', 'rockchip,rv1108-usbgrf'] > From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml > /builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-rockchip-naneng-combphy.example.dt.yaml: > syscon@fdc70000: compatible: 'oneOf' conditional failed, one must be > fixed: > ['rockchip,rk3568-pipe-phy-grf', 'syscon'] is too short > 'rockchip,rk3568-pipe-phy-grf' is not one of ['rockchip,rk3288-sgrf', > 'rockchip,rk3568-usb2phy-grf', 'rockchip,rv1108-usbgrf'] > From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/rockchip/grf.yaml > > > The problem appears to be that patch 1 was applied incorrectly and the > compatibles ended up in the wrong section (the one requiring > 'simple-mfd'). Patch 1 probably conflicts as my bot will just skip the > patch if it conflicts which is why this had a different error report. Good Afternoon Rob, This is fixed in the first patch of my rk356x dwc3 enablement series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-rockchip/patch/20220228135700.1089526-2-pgwipeout@xxxxxxxxx/ Very Respectfully, Peter Geis > > Rob > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-rockchip mailing list > Linux-rockchip@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-rockchip
