Hi Lad-san,
Thank you for the patch!
> From: Lad Prabhakar, Sent: Monday, February 28, 2022 8:08 AM
>
> Document USB phy bindings for RZ/V2L SoC. RZ/V2L USB phy is identical to
> one found on the RZ/G2L SoC. No driver changes are required as generic
> compatible string "renesas,rzg2l-usb2-phy" will be used as a fallback.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Biju Das <biju.das.jz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/renesas,usb2-phy.yaml | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/renesas,usb2-phy.yaml
> b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/renesas,usb2-phy.yaml
> index 3a6e1165419c..4c475be413ef 100644
> --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/renesas,usb2-phy.yaml
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/phy/renesas,usb2-phy.yaml
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ properties:
> - items:
> - enum:
> - renesas,usb2-phy-r9a07g044 # RZ/G2{L,LC}
> + - renesas,usb2-phy-r9a07g054 # RZ/V2L
> - const: renesas,rzg2l-usb2-phy # RZ/G2L family
The "# RZ/G2L family" is not suitable now. I think removing
the comment is better like "renesas,rcar-gen3-usb2-phy".
I don't have the RZ/V2L- documentation. So, I cannot check
whether the RZ/V2L is the same specification with RZ/G2{L,LC}.
But I trust you. So, after the comment was removed,
Acked-by: Yoshihiro Shimoda <yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Best regards,
Yoshihiro Shimoda
> reg:
> --
> 2.17.1
