On Friday 05 September 2014 07:53:16 Weike Chen wrote:
>
> - irq_set_chained_handler(irq, dwapb_irq_handler);
> - irq_set_handler_data(irq, gpio);
> + if (!pp->irq_shared) {
> + irq_set_chained_handler(pp->irq, dwapb_irq_handler);
> + irq_set_handler_data(pp->irq, gpio);
> + } else {
> + /*
> + * Request a shared IRQ since where MFD would have devices
> + * using the same irq pin
> + */
> + err = devm_request_irq(gpio->dev, pp->irq,
> + dwapb_irq_handler_mfd,
> + IRQF_SHARED, "gpio-dwapb-mfd", gpio);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(gpio->dev, "error requesting IRQ\n");
> + irq_domain_remove(gpio->domain);
> + gpio->domain = NULL;
> + return;
> + }
> + }
>
I think this need some better documentation. Why is it safe to use
devm_request_irq rather than irq_set_chained_handler here?
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_OF_GPIO
> +
> +static struct dwapb_platform_data *
> +dwapb_gpio_get_pdata_of(struct device *dev)
> +{
> + struct device_node *node, *port_np;
> + struct dwapb_platform_data *pdata;
> + struct dwapb_port_property *pp;
> + int nports;
> + int i;
> +
> + node = dev->of_node;
> + if (!node)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
Please replace the #ifdef above with
if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF_GPIO) || !node)
here so get you proper compile-time coverage of the DT code path.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
