Hello, On Wed, Feb 23, 2022 at 12:27:08AM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 09:19:12 +0100, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > DTS patches are independent. Not tested, but I really hope no downstream kernel > > depends on pwm node naming... If it does, please change it to compatible. :) > > > > Best regards, > > Krzysztof > > > > Krzysztof Kozlowski (4): > > dt-bindings: pwm: google,cros-ec: include generic pwm schema > > arm64: dts: mt8183: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema > > arm64: dts: qcom: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema > > arm64: dts: rk3399: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema > > > > [...] > > Applied, thanks! > > [4/4] arm64: dts: rk3399: align Google CROS EC PWM node name with dtschema > commit: 474a84be692d893f45a54b405dcbc137cbf77949 I expected that all patches in this series go in together via an ARM tree. Or are there expectations that this goes via PWM? Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
