Hi,
On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 1:23 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
<dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On 22/02/2022 22:25, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon, Feb 21, 2022 at 7:12 PM Dmitry Baryshkov
> > <dmitry.baryshkov@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>
> >>> +static int dp_link_psr_status(struct dp_link_private *link)
> >>> +{
> >>> + u8 status[2];
> >>> +
> >>> + drm_dp_dpcd_read(link->aux, DP_PSR_ERROR_STATUS, status, 2);
> >>> +
> >>> + if (status[0] & DP_PSR_LINK_CRC_ERROR)
> >>> + DRM_ERROR("PSR LINK CRC ERROR\n");
> >>> + else if (status[0] & DP_PSR_RFB_STORAGE_ERROR)
> >>> + DRM_ERROR("PSR RFB STORAGE ERROR\n");
> >>> + else if (status[0] & DP_PSR_VSC_SDP_UNCORRECTABLE_ERROR)
> >>> + DRM_ERROR("PSR VSC SDP UNCORRECTABLE ERROR\n");
> >>> + else if (status[1] & DP_PSR_CAPS_CHANGE)
> >>> + DRM_INFO("PSR Capability Change\n");
> >>
> >> DRM_DEBUG_DP
> >
> > Not sure I'll have time to go back and review the series, but one
> > thing that caught my eye as this flashed through my inbox is that I
> > think all of these "shouting" are deprecated. It's even officially
> > documented now as of commit d2f0a8afc1be ("UPSTREAM: drm/print: Add
> > deprecation notes to DRM_...() functions").
>
> Agreed. But not the DRM_INFO too.
You're saying that DRM_INFO _isn't_ deprecated? I was pretty sure that
it was, too. If not, can you please submit a patch to `drm_print.h`
clarifying since my patch (which folks Acked) marked it as deprecated:
+/* NOTE: this is deprecated in favor of pr_info(). */
#define DRM_INFO(fmt, ...) \
_DRM_PRINTK(, INFO, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
My understanding (also in the description of my patch) was that
DRM_INFO() by itself didn't add much so we should just use the
standard pr_info(). If pr_info() wasn't to your liking then it was
better to do drm_info(drmdev, ...) or drm_info(NULL, ...);
-Doug
