Manikanta Pubbisetty <quic_mpubbise@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> On 1/28/2022 5:43 PM, Kalle Valo wrote:
>> Manikanta Pubbisetty <quic_mpubbise@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>>
>>> Unlike other ATH11K PCIe devices which are enumerated by APSS
>>> processor (Application Processor SubSystem), WCN6750 gets
>>> enumerated by the WPSS Q6 processor (Wireless Processor SubSystem);
>>> In simple terms, though WCN6750 is PCIe device, it is not attached
>>> to the APSS processor, APSS will not know of such a device being
>>> present in the system and therefore WCN6750 will be registered as
>>> a platform device to the kernel core like other supported AHB
>>> devices.
>>>
>>> WCN6750 uses both AHB and PCI APIs for it's operation, it uses
>>> AHB APIs for device probe/boot and PCI APIs for device setup
>>> and register accesses; Because of this nature, it is referred
>>> as a hybrid bus device.
>>>
>>> Refactor PCI code to support hybrid bus devices like WCN6750.
>>>
>>> Tested-on: WCN6750 hw1.0 AHB WLAN.MSL.1.0.1-00573-QCAMSLSWPLZ-1
>>> Tested-on: WCN6855 hw2.0 PCI WLAN.HSP.1.1-01720.1-QCAHSPSWPL_V1_V2_SILICONZ_LITE-1
>>> Tested-on: QCN9074 hw1.0 PCI WLAN.HK.2.5.0.1-01100-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
>>> Tested-on: IPQ8074 hw2.0 AHB WLAN.HK.2.4.0.1-00192-QCAHKSWPL_SILICONZ-1
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Manikanta Pubbisetty <quic_mpubbise@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath11k/pci_cmn.c
>>
>> [...]
>>
>>> +static inline void ath11k_pci_select_window(struct ath11k_pci *ab_pci, u32 offset)
>>> +{
>>> + struct ath11k_base *ab = ab_pci->ab;
>>> +
>>> + u32 window = FIELD_GET(ATH11K_PCI_WINDOW_VALUE_MASK, offset);
>>> +
>>> + lockdep_assert_held(&ab_pci->window_lock);
>>> +
>>> + if (window != ab_pci->register_window) {
>>> + iowrite32(ATH11K_PCI_WINDOW_ENABLE_BIT | window,
>>> + ab->mem + ATH11K_PCI_WINDOW_REG_ADDRESS);
>>> + ioread32(ab->mem + ATH11K_PCI_WINDOW_REG_ADDRESS);
>>> + ab_pci->register_window = window;
>>> + }
>>> +}
>>
>> So the style used in ath11k is ath11k_<filename>_foo, so that a function
>> ath11k_pci_foo() should be in pci.c. This patch is now breaking that
>> style. Maybe pci_cmn.c should renamed to cpci.c, pcic.c or something
>> like that? Then the function prefix could be ath11k_cpci_, ath11k_pcic_
>> or similar.
>>
>
> Makes sense, pcic.c and ath11k_pcic_* looks better, I'll make these changes.
Of course another possiblity, which I forgot to mention in my previous
email, is to keep pci_cmn.c filename but rename the functions to
ath11k_pci_cmn_foo(). Though don't know which one is better.
--
https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-wireless/list/
https://wireless.wiki.kernel.org/en/developers/documentation/submittingpatches
