Re: [PATCH v3 2/3] dt-bindings:iio:amplifiers: add ada4250 doc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 20/02/2022 12:48, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Sun, 20 Feb 2022 11:53:55 +0100
> Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
>> On 14/02/2022 10:41, Antoniu Miclaus wrote:
>>> Add device tree bindings for the ADA4250 driver.  
>>
>> Please put the bindings patch as first in the series.
>>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>>  .../bindings/iio/amplifiers/adi,ada4250.yaml  | 48 +++++++++++++++++++
>>>  1 file changed, 48 insertions(+)
>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/amplifiers/adi,ada4250.yaml
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/amplifiers/adi,ada4250.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/amplifiers/adi,ada4250.yaml
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 000000000000..22283ab48903
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iio/amplifiers/adi,ada4250.yaml
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@
>>> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
>>> +%YAML 1.2
>>> +---
>>> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iio/amplifiers/adi,ada4250.yaml#
>>> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
>>> +
>>> +title: ADA4250 Programmable Gain Instrumentation Amplifier
>>> +
>>> +maintainers:
>>> +  - Antoniu Miclaus <antoniu.miclaus@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> +
>>> +description: |
>>> +  Precision Low Power, 110kHz, 26uA, Programmable Gain Instrumentation Amplifier.
>>> +
>>> +properties:
>>> +  compatible:
>>> +    enum:
>>> +      - adi,ada4250
>>> +
>>> +  reg:
>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>> +
>>> +  avdd-supply: true  
>>
>> Needs a description, not a true.
> 
> For a generic supply where all we really have is a name, I'm not sure
> a description adds anything.  Of course, if there is more info that can be provided
> a description is great to have.

Hm, OK, if the description would be "AVDD supply", then indeed does not
make much sense.

> 
>>
>> As Jonathan said, you should allow spi-max-frequency (so
>> spi-max-frequency: true).
>>
>> No io-channel-cells?
> 
> I'm not sure you'd have a consumer of this type of device, so
> it may not make sense...

OK.


Best regards,
Krzysztof



[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux