On Wednesday 03 September 2014 11:49:56 Mike Turquette wrote: > > Right, makes sense. We have in the past done it either way for other > > platforms. When merging the patches through the clk subsystem, it still > > makes sense to let us know of those plans and ask for an Ack from > > the arm-soc maintainers, to be sure we can plan ahead in case there > > are other (conflicting) patch sets that are sent through arm-soc. > > Do I have your Ack for the arch/arm patches? > > [0] https://lkml.kernel.org/r/<1409758148-20104-1-git-send-email-tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> I have no objection to the change, but we might need to be careful in case we get a lot of conflicts. How about making it a shared branch that you plan to send upstream but that we can also include in arm-soc to avoid conflicts if necessary? Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
