On 16/02/2022 10:47, Macpaul Lin wrote: > > > On 2/16/22 5:32 PM, xinlei.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> From: Xinlei Lee <xinlei.lee@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Changes since v1: >> 1. Fixed formatting issues mentioned in the v1. >> 2. Delete pwm-mtk-disp.txt. >> 3. Add mtk_pwm dt_maintainers. >> 4. Add "#pwm-cells" & power-domains properties. >> 5. Make dt_checking successful. >> >> Xinlei Lee (4): >> dt-bindings: pwm: Convert pwm-mtk-disp.txt to mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml >> format >> dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8192 >> dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8195 >> dt-bindings: pwm: Add compatible for MediaTek MT8186 >> >> .../bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml | 74 +++++++++++++++++++ >> .../devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt | 44 ----------- >> 2 files changed, 74 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) >> create mode 100755 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/mediatek,pwm-disp.yaml >> delete mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pwm/pwm-mtk-disp.txt >> > > Why did you drop [PATCH] tag in the subject of your patch series? > Please keep it for distinguishing it from RFC/RESEND and other > meaningful tags next time. I also asked for this in v1 patchset, so it's a pity my suggestion was not listened to. Best regards, Krzysztof
