On Mon, 14 Feb 2022 18:56:57 +0000, Sander Vanheule <sander@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > The original implementation for this interrupt controller/router used > an interrupt-map parser to determine which parent interrupts were > present. However, this controller is not transparent, so a list of > parent interrupts seems more appropriate, while also getting rid of the > assumed routing to parent interrupts. > > Additionally, N real cascaded interrupts are implemented, instead of > handling all input interrupts with one cascaded interrupt. Otherwise it > is possible that the priority of the parent interrupts is not respected. My original question[1] still stands. An old kernel breaks with a new DT. I am not convinced that this is an acceptable outcome. M. [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/874k585efy.wl-maz@xxxxxxxxxx -- Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
