Hi Rob, On Mon, 2022-02-07 at 14:24 +0800, Roger Lu wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On Tue, 2022-02-01 at 17:40 -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 11:39:50 +0800, Roger Lu wrote: > > > Document the binding for enabling mtk svs on MediaTek SoC. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Roger Lu <roger.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > .../bindings/soc/mediatek/mtk-svs.yaml | 83 +++++++++++++++++++ > > > 1 file changed, 83 insertions(+) > > > create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/mediatek/mtk- > > > svs.yaml > > > > > > > > > Please add Acked-by/Reviewed-by tags when posting new versions. However, > > there's no need to repost patches *only* to add the tags. The upstream > > maintainer will do that for acks received on the version they apply. > > > > If a tag was not added on purpose, please state why and what changed. > > Oh, this patch has error detected and shown in [1]. Therefore, I fix it and > state the change at [2]. Thanks for the explanation and time to review the > patch. Excuse me, just for the double check. Since this issue [1] is fixed, could I add your Reviewed-by tags back or just send the next version directly without adding any tags. Thanks a lot. > > [1] > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/patch/20220107095200.4389-2-roger.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxx/__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!2KArHJHZu-89hcY8BqxHqe4fB0IVbahNropr5XS4dGEVniMY0xUfdoa5znw1VQFN$ > > [2] > https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/cover/20220127033956.24585-1-roger.lu@xxxxxxxxxxxx/__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!2KArHJHZu-89hcY8BqxHqe4fB0IVbahNropr5XS4dGEVniMY0xUfdoa5zvor4e0p$ > > - Remove unnecessary "maxItems" from nvmem-cells in mtk-svs.yaml. > > > _______________________________________________ > Linux-mediatek mailing list > Linux-mediatek@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://urldefense.com/v3/__http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-mediatek__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!2KArHJHZu-89hcY8BqxHqe4fB0IVbahNropr5XS4dGEVniMY0xUfdoa5zmaupAcC$ >
