RE: [EXTERNAL] Re: [PATCH RESEND v4 1/4] dt-bindings: platform: microsoft: Document surface xbl

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jarrett Schultz wrote:
> From: Jarrett Schultz
> 
> Rob Herring wrote:
> > From: Rob Herring <robh@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 10:28:23AM -0800, Jarrett Schultz wrote:
> > > From: Jarrett Schultz <jaschultz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > >
> > > +title: Surface Extensible Bootloader for Microsoft Surface Duo
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > +  - Jarrett Schultz <jaschultz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > +
> > > +description: |
> > > +  Defined to expose information that is used during production when
> > > +  device is in manufacturing mode. Some of the information included
> > > +  in this imem section is -
> >
> > If this is onchip sram, we have a binding for that. That's not an MFD.
> 
> I now have this driver working with nvmem, but I could not find the binding
> that you are talking about here. Could you point me to the binding?
> 
> Thanks,
> Jarrett
> 

Rob,

I followed up with my team members who have let me know that this lies in DDR rather than SRAM. Could you please point me to the correct binding to use?

Thanks,
Jarrett

> >
> > > +    * board_id
> > > +    * battery_present
> > > +    * hw_init_retries
> > > +    * is_customer_mode
> > > +    * is_act_mode
> > > +    * pmic_reset_reason
> > > +    * touch_fw_version
> > > +    * ocp_error_location
> >
> > nvmem binding doesn't work for describing these fields?
> >
> > > +  See sysfs documentation for more information.
> >
> > sysfs? Not relevant to the binding.
> >
> > > +
> > > +properties:
> > > +  compatible:
> > > +    const: simple-mfd
> > > +
> > > +  reg:
> > > +    maxItems: 1
> > > +
> > > +additionalProperties: false
> > > +
> > > +required:
> > > +  - compatible
> > > +  - reg
> > > +  - ranges
> > > +  - address-cells
> > > +  - size-cells
> > > +
> > > +examples:
> > > +  - |
> > > +    / {
> > > +        compatible = "foo";
> > > +        model = "foo";
> >
> > No need to make this the root node with a fake compatible.
> >
> > > +        #address-cells = <2>;
> > > +        #size-cells = <2>;
> > > +
> > > +        imem@146bf000 {
> > > +          compatible = "simple-mfd";
> > > +          reg = <0x0 0x146bf000 0x0 0x1000>;
> > > +          ranges = <0x0 0x0 0x146bf000 0x1000>;
> > > +          #address-cells = <1>;
> > > +          #size-cells = <1>;
> > > +          status = "okay";
> >
> > Don't show status in examples.
> >
> > > +
> > > +          xbl@a94 {
> > > +            compatible = "microsoft,sm8150-surface-duo-xbl";
> > > +            reg = <0xa94 0x100>;
> > > +            status = "okay";
> > > +          };
> > > +        };
> > > +      };
> > > diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index
> > > 13f9a84a617e..5d0ca2a98b57 100644
> > > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > > +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> > > @@ -12649,6 +12649,13 @@ F:	Documentation/driver-
> > api/surface_aggregator/clients/dtx.rst
> > >  F:	drivers/platform/surface/surface_dtx.c
> > >  F:	include/uapi/linux/surface_aggregator/dtx.h
> > >
> > > +MICROSOFT SURFACE DUO XBL DRIVER
> > > +M:	Jarrett Schultz <jaschultz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > +L:	linux-arm-msm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > +L:	platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > +S:	Supported
> > > +F:	Documentation/devicetree/bindings/platform/microsoft/surface-
> > xbl.yaml
> > > +
> > >  MICROSOFT SURFACE GPE LID SUPPORT DRIVER
> > >  M:	Maximilian Luz <luzmaximilian@xxxxxxxxx>
> > >  L:	platform-driver-x86@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > --
> > > 2.25.1
> > >
> > >




[Index of Archives]     [Device Tree Compilter]     [Device Tree Spec]     [Linux Driver Backports]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux PCI Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [XFree86]     [Yosemite Backpacking]


  Powered by Linux