RE: [PATCH 11/15] dt-bindings: pwm: intel,keembay: do not require pwm-cells

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: RE: [PATCH 11/15] dt-bindings: pwm: intel,keembay: do not require pwm-cells
From: "Ayyathurai, Vijayakannan" <vijayakannan.ayyathurai@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2022 17:54:38 +0000
Accept-language: en-US
Dlp-product: dlpe-windows
Dlp-reaction: no-action
Dlp-version: 11.6.200.16
In-reply-to: <20220214081605.161394-11-krzysztof.kozlowski@canonical.com>

Hi,

>
>pwm-cells are already required by pwm.yaml schema.
>
>Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Acked-by: Vijayakannan Ayyathurai <vijayakannan.ayyathurai@xxxxxxxxx>

References:
- [PATCH 01/15] dt-bindings: pwm: allwinner,sun4i-a10: include generic pwm schema
  - From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
- [PATCH 11/15] dt-bindings: pwm: intel,keembay: do not require pwm-cells
  - From: Krzysztof Kozlowski

Prev by Date: [PATCH v1 2/2] mm: enforce pageblock_order < MAX_ORDER
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v1 1/2] cma: factor out minimum alignment requirement
Previous by thread: [PATCH 11/15] dt-bindings: pwm: intel,keembay: do not require pwm-cells
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 11/15] dt-bindings: pwm: intel, keembay: do not require pwm-cells
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Device Tree Compilter] [Device Tree Spec] [Linux Driver Backports] [Video for Linux] [Linux USB Devel] [Linux PCI Devel] [Linux Audio Users] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI] [XFree86] [Yosemite Backpacking]

Powered by Linux