Hi,
On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 4:34 PM Doug Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 4:33 PM Bjorn Andersson
> <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon 31 Jan 18:25 CST 2022, Doug Anderson wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Mon, Jan 31, 2022 at 4:11 PM Douglas Anderson <dianders@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> > > > index 40cb414bc377..dc98a87e2871 100644
> > > > --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> > > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7280.dtsi
> > > > @@ -616,6 +616,9 @@ qfprom: efuse@784000 {
> > > >
> > > > sdhc_1: sdhci@7c4000 {
> > > > compatible = "qcom,sc7280-sdhci", "qcom,sdhci-msm-v5";
> > > > + pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
> > > > + pinctrl-0 = <&sdc1_clk>, <&sdc1_cmd>, <&sdc1_data>, <&sdc1_rclk>;
> > > > + pinctrl-1 = <&sdc1_clk_sleep>, <&sdc1_cmd_sleep>, <&sdc1_data_sleep>, <&sdc1_rclk_sleep>;
> > > > status = "disabled";
> > > >
> > > > reg = <0 0x007c4000 0 0x1000>,
> > > > @@ -2425,6 +2428,9 @@ apss_merge_funnel_in: endpoint {
> > > >
> > > > sdhc_2: sdhci@8804000 {
> > > > compatible = "qcom,sc7280-sdhci", "qcom,sdhci-msm-v5";
> > > > + pinctrl-names = "default", "sleep";
> > > > + pinctrl-0 = <&sdc2_clk>, <&sdc2_cmd>, <&sdc2_data>;
> > > > + pinctrl-1 = <&sdc2_clk_sleep>, <&sdc2_cmd_sleep>, <&sdc2_data_sleep>;
> > > > status = "disabled";
> > > >
> > > > reg = <0 0x08804000 0 0x1000>;
> > > > @@ -3943,81 +3949,76 @@ qup_uart15_rx: qup-uart15-rx {
> > > > function = "qup17";
> > > > };
> > > >
> > > > - sdc1_on: sdc1-on {
> > > > - clk {
> > > > - pins = "sdc1_clk";
> > > > - };
> > > >
> > > > - cmd {
> > > > - pins = "sdc1_cmd";
> > > > - };
> > > >
> > > > - data {
> > > > - pins = "sdc1_data";
> > > > - };
> > > > + sdc1_clk: sdc1-clk {
> > >
> > > Ugh. I just noticed that there are way too many blank lines here in
> > > the output. Happy to have this fixed when applying or I can post a v2.
> > >
> >
> > I can fix that up as I apply it. Will let it sit for a few days to
> > attract reviews first though.
>
> Sounds good. Thanks! I might end up sending a v2 anyway since I found
> a few more fixups, but I'll at least wait a day or two so I don't spam
> people too hard.
Breadcrumbs: I ended up sending out a v2 (tagged as v3 for other
reasons) that fixes this.
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20220202132301.v3.4.I79baad7f52351aafb470f8b21a9fa79d7031ad6a@changeid/
-Doug
