> > Good Evening, > > While I'm not against this idea, my main concern still stands. > I spent a great deal of thought on this, and decided to go the route I > did to maintain consistency with previous generations. > As such, I see one of three paths here: > - Pull this patch only and depart rk356x from previous SoCs. > - Do the same for previous SoCs to maintain consistency. > - Drop this patch to maintain consistency with previous SoCs. > > I ask that others weigh in here, as offline discussion has produced > mixed results already. just pure user perspective (who spent last weeks considerable time to develop DT for rk3566 tvbox. 99% of my work was by reading/learning from other boards existing DT's. Any inconsistencies in DTs makes work for such ppl like me much more harder): For option 1 - i don't see value For option 2 - what is reward for extra work needs to be done on all other SoCs? so option 3 seems to be natural choice... in other words: for me: option 1 brings practically zero value + increased inconsistency. option 2: extra work - but consistency is like in option 3 (so where is value?) so option 3 offers the same consistency - but without extra work... just my 0.02$
