On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 14:21:16 +0100, RafaÅ? MiÅ?ecki wrote: > From: RafaÅ? MiÅ?ecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx> > > This hardware block is used on almost all BCM63xx family chipsets and > BCM4908 which reuses a lot of BCM63xx parts. Add relevant compatible > strings and also include a generic one. > > The only SoC with a different block I found is BCM6838 (thus not included > in this change). > > It may be worth noting that BCM6338, BCM6345, BCM6348 and BCM63268 don't > include "SoftRst" register but that can be handled by drivers based on > precise compatible string. > > Signed-off-by: RafaÅ? MiÅ?ecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx> > --- > .../bindings/watchdog/brcm,bcm7038-wdt.yaml | 21 +++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > My bot found errors running 'make DT_CHECKER_FLAGS=-m dt_binding_check' on your patch (DT_CHECKER_FLAGS is new in v5.13): yamllint warnings/errors: dtschema/dtc warnings/errors: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/brcm,twd.example.dt.yaml: timer-mfd@ff800400: watchdog@28:compatible: ['brcm,bcm7038-wdt'] is too short From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/brcm,twd.yaml /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/brcm,twd.example.dt.yaml: watchdog@28: compatible: ['brcm,bcm7038-wdt'] is too short From schema: /builds/robherring/linux-dt-review/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/watchdog/brcm,bcm7038-wdt.yaml doc reference errors (make refcheckdocs): See https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1584464 This check can fail if there are any dependencies. The base for a patch series is generally the most recent rc1. If you already ran 'make dt_binding_check' and didn't see the above error(s), then make sure 'yamllint' is installed and dt-schema is up to date: pip3 install dtschema --upgrade Please check and re-submit.