>-----Original Message----- >From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 2:50 PM >To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm- >kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >Cc: soc@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >olof@xxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx; linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx; >catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx; robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx; >linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx; >sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx >Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/16] Add support for Tesla Full Self-Driving (FSD) SoC > >On 26/01/2022 07:50, Alim Akhtar wrote: >> Hi Krzysztof >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Krzysztof Kozlowski [mailto:krzysztof.kozlowski@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] >>> Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2022 10:56 PM >>> To: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@xxxxxxxxxxx>; linux-arm- >>> kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>> Cc: soc@xxxxxxxxxx; linux-clk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; >>> devicetree@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; olof@xxxxxxxxx; arnd@xxxxxxxx; >>> linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx; catalin.marinas@xxxxxxx; >>> robh+dt@xxxxxxxxxx; s.nawrocki@xxxxxxxxxxx; >>> linux-samsung-soc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; pankaj.dubey@xxxxxxxxxxx; >>> sboyd@xxxxxxxxxx >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/16] Add support for Tesla Full Self-Driving >>> (FSD) SoC >>> >>> On 25/01/2022 18:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >>>> On 24/01/2022 15:16, Alim Akhtar wrote: >>>>> Adds basic support for the Tesla Full Self-Driving (FSD) SoC. This >>>>> SoC contains three clusters of four Cortex-A72 CPUs, as well as >>>>> several IPs. >>>>> >>>>> Patches 1 to 9 provide support for the clock controller (which is >>>>> designed similarly to Exynos SoCs). >>>>> >>>>> The remaining changes provide pinmux support, initial device tree >support. >>>>> >>>>> - Changes since v4 >>>>> * fixed 'make dtbs_check' warnings on patch 14/16 >>>>> >>>>> - Changes since v3 >>>>> * Addressed Stefen's review comments on patch 14/16 >>>>> * Fixed kernel test robot warning on patch 04/16 >>>>> * rebsaed this series on Krzysztof's pinmux new binding schema work >>>>> [1] >>>>> >>>>> - Changes since v2 >>>>> * Addressed Krzysztof's and Stephen's review comments >>>>> * Added Reviewed-by and Acked-by tags >>>>> * Rebased on next-20220120 >>>>> >>>>> - Changes since v1 >>>>> * fixed make dt_binding_check error as pointed by Rob >>>>> * Addressed Krzysztof's and Rob's review comments >>>>> * Added Reviewed-by and Acked-by tags >>>>> * Dropped SPI, MCT and ADC from this series (to be posted in small >>>>> sets) >>>>> >>>>> NOTE: These patches are based on Krzysztof's pinmux for-next branch >>>>> commit 832ae134ccc1 ("pinctrl: samsung: add support for Exynos850 >>>>> and >>>>> ExynosAutov9 wake-ups") [1] >>>>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/pinctrl/samsung.git >>>>> /l >>>>> og/?h=for-next >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks, applied DTS/soc and pinctrl patches. >>>> >>>> I expect Sylwester will pick up the clock ones. Otherwise please let >>>> me know to pick it up as well. >>> >>> I forgot that clock macros are used in DTS. This does not compile and >>> I cannot take drivers into DTS branch. >>> >>> Alim, >>> DTS changes dropped. Please resend with the same trick we did for >>> Exynos850 board - hard-coded clock IDs as defines. See: >>> >>> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/krzk/linux.git/diff/a >>> rch/arm6 >>> 4/boot/dts/exynos/exynos850.dtsi?h=samsung-dt64-5.17- >>> 2&id=e3493220fd3e474abcdcefbe14fb60485097ce06 >>> >> Ok, I will resend patch 14 and 15 (DTS changes) only as suggested above. > >I see Sylwester acked clock patches, so I will take them. No need to resend, I'll >organize the patches so they will compile. > Awesome, thanks Krzysztof and Sylwester > >Best regards, >Krzysztof
