Hi Laurent,
On Wed, Dec 29, 2021 at 8:18 PM Laurent Pinchart
<laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Endpoints node must have a remote-endpoint property, as endpoints only
> exist to model a link between ports. Drop the empty lvds endpoints from
> SoC dtsi files, then should be instead declared in the board dts or in
> overlays.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks for your patch!
I'm interested in hearing Rob's opinion about the general idea...
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774a1.dtsi | 2 --
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774b1.dtsi | 2 --
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774c0.dtsi | 4 ----
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774e1.dtsi | 2 --
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77951.dtsi | 2 --
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77960.dtsi | 2 --
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77965.dtsi | 2 --
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77970.dtsi | 2 --
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77980.dtsi | 2 --
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77990.dtsi | 4 ----
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a77995.dtsi | 4 ----
> 11 files changed, 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774a1.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774a1.dtsi
> index 6f4fffacfca2..9a8c1bd923af 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774a1.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/renesas/r8a774a1.dtsi
> @@ -2771,8 +2771,6 @@ lvds0_in: endpoint {
> };
> port@1 {
> reg = <1>;
> - lvds0_out: endpoint {
> - };
As there are several DTS files that refer to this label, this change
will break them?
> base-commit: 2b534e90a1e31c7fc9536b512b72274cc3575f4c
Why does this depend on a commit in drm-next?
DTS changes are supposed to go in through renesas-devel and soc.
> prerequisite-patch-id: 98434eb22c020924bc338316e54a7b42ea339e9f
> prerequisite-patch-id: ce261c9865255051f2c2107a930b0f15ce862703
> prerequisite-patch-id: 500ab746415c5421e41128c2b0db35987d8d7a49
> prerequisite-patch-id: ad2d5ad025f9cfa0dc453d7e0b2aa96b4514afd7
> prerequisite-patch-id: ac76bcc0f7b278863e362db083a7d64bbd0bd030
> prerequisite-patch-id: c7a7c3a6b9dbbae18a768160db70d7010ea71ca5
While Google does not index by commit ID or patch ID, at least the
base-commit can be found easily in linux-next. But even with some
scripting, the prerequisites cannot. What are these prerequisites?
Do you have lore links?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
