On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 06:24:45PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 05:07:43PM +0000, David Brazdil wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 12:29:15PM +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 06, 2022 at 10:50:41AM +0000, David Brazdil wrote:
> > > > Hi Wedson,
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, Jan 05, 2022 at 04:52:51PM +0000, Wedson Almeida Filho wrote:
> > > > > On Tue, Dec 21, 2021 at 05:45:02PM +0000, David Brazdil wrote:
> > > > > > Open Profile for DICE is an open protocol for measured boot compatible
> > > > > > with the Trusted Computing Group's Device Identifier Composition
> > > > > > Engine (DICE) specification. The generated Compound Device Identifier
> > > > > > (CDI) certificates represent the hardware/software combination measured
> > > > > > by DICE, and can be used for remote attestation and sealing.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Add a driver that exposes reserved memory regions populated by firmware
> > > > > > with DICE CDIs and exposes them to userspace via a character device.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Userspace obtains the memory region's size from read() and calls mmap()
> > > > > > to create a mapping of the memory region in its address space. The
> > > > > > mapping is not allowed to be write+shared, giving userspace a guarantee
> > > > > > that the data were not overwritten by another process.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Userspace can also call write(), which triggers a wipe of the DICE data
> > > > > > by the driver. Because both the kernel and userspace mappings use
> > > > > > write-combine semantics, all clients observe the memory as zeroed after
> > > > > > the syscall has returned.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Cc: Andrew Scull <ascull@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > Cc: Will Deacon <will@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > > drivers/misc/Kconfig | 12 +++
> > > > > > drivers/misc/Makefile | 1 +
> > > > > > drivers/misc/open-dice.c | 188 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > > > > > drivers/of/platform.c | 1 +
> > > > > > 4 files changed, 202 insertions(+)
> > > > > > create mode 100644 drivers/misc/open-dice.c
> > > > > >
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/Kconfig b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> > > > > > index 0f5a49fc7c9e..a2b26426efba 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/misc/Kconfig
> > > > > > @@ -470,6 +470,18 @@ config HISI_HIKEY_USB
> > > > > > switching between the dual-role USB-C port and the USB-A host ports
> > > > > > using only one USB controller.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +config OPEN_DICE
> > > > > > + tristate "Open Profile for DICE driver"
> > > > > > + depends on OF_RESERVED_MEM
> > > > > > + help
> > > > > > + This driver exposes a DICE reserved memory region to userspace via
> > > > > > + a character device. The memory region contains Compound Device
> > > > > > + Identifiers (CDIs) generated by firmware as an output of DICE
> > > > > > + measured boot flow. Userspace can use CDIs for remote attestation
> > > > > > + and sealing.
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + If unsure, say N.
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > source "drivers/misc/c2port/Kconfig"
> > > > > > source "drivers/misc/eeprom/Kconfig"
> > > > > > source "drivers/misc/cb710/Kconfig"
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/Makefile b/drivers/misc/Makefile
> > > > > > index a086197af544..70e800e9127f 100644
> > > > > > --- a/drivers/misc/Makefile
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/misc/Makefile
> > > > > > @@ -59,3 +59,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_UACCE) += uacce/
> > > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_XILINX_SDFEC) += xilinx_sdfec.o
> > > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_HISI_HIKEY_USB) += hisi_hikey_usb.o
> > > > > > obj-$(CONFIG_HI6421V600_IRQ) += hi6421v600-irq.o
> > > > > > +obj-$(CONFIG_OPEN_DICE) += open-dice.o
> > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/open-dice.c b/drivers/misc/open-dice.c
> > > > > > new file mode 100644
> > > > > > index 000000000000..f1819f951173
> > > > > > --- /dev/null
> > > > > > +++ b/drivers/misc/open-dice.c
> > > > > > @@ -0,0 +1,188 @@
> > > > > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> > > > > > +/*
> > > > > > + * Copyright (C) 2021 - Google LLC
> > > > > > + * Author: David Brazdil <dbrazdil@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * Driver for Open Profile for DICE.
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * This driver takes ownership of a reserved memory region containing data
> > > > > > + * generated by the Open Profile for DICE measured boot protocol. The memory
> > > > > > + * contents are not interpreted by the kernel but can be mapped into a userspace
> > > > > > + * process via a misc device. Userspace can also request a wipe of the memory.
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * Userspace can access the data with (w/o error handling):
> > > > > > + *
> > > > > > + * fd = open("/dev/open-dice0", O_RDWR);
> > > > > > + * read(fd, &size, sizeof(unsigned long));
> > > > > > + * data = mmap(NULL, size, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE, fd, 0);
> > > > > > + * write(fd, NULL, 0); // wipe
> > > > > > + * close(fd);
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#include <linux/io.h>
> > > > > > +#include <linux/miscdevice.h>
> > > > > > +#include <linux/mm.h>
> > > > > > +#include <linux/module.h>
> > > > > > +#include <linux/of_reserved_mem.h>
> > > > > > +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +#define DRIVER_NAME "open-dice"
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +struct open_dice_drvdata {
> > > > > > + spinlock_t lock;
> > > > > > + char name[16];
> > > > > > + struct reserved_mem *rmem;
> > > > > > + struct miscdevice misc;
> > > > > > +};
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static inline struct open_dice_drvdata *to_open_dice_drvdata(struct file *filp)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + return container_of(filp->private_data, struct open_dice_drvdata, misc);
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +static int open_dice_wipe(struct open_dice_drvdata *drvdata)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + void *kaddr;
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + spin_lock(&drvdata->lock);
> > > > > > + kaddr = devm_memremap(drvdata->misc.this_device, drvdata->rmem->base,
> > > > > > + drvdata->rmem->size, MEMREMAP_WC);
> > > > > > + if (IS_ERR(kaddr)) {
> > > > > > + spin_unlock(&drvdata->lock);
> > > > > > + return PTR_ERR(kaddr);
> > > > > > + }
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > + memset(kaddr, 0, drvdata->rmem->size);
> > > > > > + devm_memunmap(drvdata->misc.this_device, kaddr);
> > > > > > + spin_unlock(&drvdata->lock);
> > > > > > + return 0;
> > > > > > +}
> > > > > > +
> > > > > > +/*
> > > > > > + * Copies the size of the reserved memory region to the user-provided buffer.
> > > > > > + */
> > > > > > +static ssize_t open_dice_read(struct file *filp, char __user *ptr, size_t len,
> > > > > > + loff_t *off)
> > > > > > +{
> > > > > > + unsigned long val = to_open_dice_drvdata(filp)->rmem->size;
> > > > >
> > > > > There's a UAF issue here (and in all file operations that call
> > > > > to_open_dice_drvdata) when the platform device in unbounded from the driver
> > > > > while userspace has an instance of the misc device open: after open_dice_remove
> > > > > is called, all managed resources are freed (which includes this
> > > > > open_dice_drvdata allocation).
> > > > >
> > > > > No new miscdev files can be created, but the existing ones continue to exist
> > > > > with a now dangling pointer stored in private_data. So read/write/mmap syscalls
> > > > > from userspace will lead to dereferencing this dangling pointer.
> > > >
> > > > Please correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't think this can happen
> > > > without tainting the kernel.
> > > >
> > > > To call open_dice_remove, we have to remove the module. And any process
> > > > holding an FD of the misc device will increase the module's refcounter,
> > > > which is zero-checked in SYS_delete_module. The only way to get past
> > > > that check is by compiling the kernel with CONFIG_MODULE_FORCE_UNLOAD,
> > > > which changes the implementation of try_force_unload (kernel/module.c)
> > > > and adds taint. Otherwise SYS_delete_module returns an error.
> > > >
> > > > Unless there is another way how to trigger this situation, I think the
> > > > existing protection is sufficient. The user cannot force the removal of
> > > > the module without agreeing to the consequences.
> > >
> > > You can remove the driver from the device by writing to the "unbind"
> > > file in sysfs for this driver.
> > >
> > > Otherwise, yes, you are correct, you can not remove the module from the
> > > system if the file is open, but that does not prevent the driver from
> > > being unbound from the device.
> > >
> > > Yes, it is rare, and only able to be done by root, and even then is
> > > something that many drivers fail at. But for new ones, when we notice
> > > it, it should be fixed up before merging just to prevent any future
> > > problems.
> >
> > Ah, I see. I'd opt for just setting 'suppress_bind_attrs=true' to
> > prevent that, unless you think unbinding needs to be supported. I don't
> > see a use for that on our side and would prefer to keep the code simple.
>
> No objection from me, that solves it easily :)
>
> > > > > > + /* Create write-combine mapping so all clients observe a wipe. */
> > > > > > + vma->vm_page_prot = pgprot_writecombine(vma->vm_page_prot);
> > > > > > + vma->vm_flags |= VM_DONTCOPY | VM_DONTDUMP;
> > > > > > + return vm_iomap_memory(vma, drvdata->rmem->base, drvdata->rmem->size);
> > > > > > +}
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there a reason for mapping this memory instead of, say, copying it to
> > > > > userspace via read?
> > > >
> > > > The data should be treated as secret, so the idea is that avoiding
> > > > reading it in the kernel means we don't need to worry about it leakage
> > > > via the stack, etc. The reason for this is that the DICE derivation
> > > > chain may continue in userspace, so we want to minimize the chance of
> > > > a child process getting the parent secret from the kernel.
> > >
> > > The kernel stack is already secret, this should not be an issue. And
> > > even then, you can always erase it before the call returns to ensure
> > > that it does not stick around, like many crypto functions do.
> >
> > I can rewrite it and memzero_explicit the memory if you or Wedson feel
> > strongly about this, but I actually really like mmap() because it avoids
> > the need for dealing with that.
>
> I think if we remove the ability for userspace to unbind the device from
> the driver with the file handle open like above, all should be ok to
> keep this as a mmap thing.
>
> Wedson, any objection?
No object from me, I like simplicity!
For maintainability, I think it would be a good idea to leave a comment when
setting suppress_bind_attrs to true that indicates that if one wants to change
it to false in the future, one must ensure that mappings are torn down and
lifetime issues with drvdata are addressed after unbind.
Cheers,
-Wedson
