On Wed, Jan 5, 2022 at 8:37 AM Zev Weiss <zev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> We've ended up with some inconsistencies between the addresses in the
> DT node labels and the actual offsets of the partitions; this brings
> them back in sync.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zev Weiss <zev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Fixes: 529022738c8e ("ARM: dts: Add OpenBMC flash layout")
> Fixes: 8dec60e7b8d0 ("ARM: dts: aspeed: Grow u-boot partition 64MiB OpenBMC flash layout")
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout-64.dtsi | 2 +-
> arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout.dtsi | 2 +-
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout-64.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout-64.dtsi
> index 31f59de5190b..7af41361c480 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout-64.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout-64.dtsi
> @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ rofs@a00000 {
> label = "rofs";
> };
>
> - rwfs@6000000 {
> + rwfs@2a00000 {
> reg = <0x2a00000 0x1600000>; // 22MB
> label = "rwfs";
> };
> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout.dtsi
> index 6c26524e93e1..b47e14063c38 100644
> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout.dtsi
> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/openbmc-flash-layout.dtsi
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ kernel@80000 {
> label = "kernel";
> };
>
> - rofs@c0000 {
> + rofs@4c0000 {
> reg = <0x4c0000 0x1740000>;
> label = "rofs";
> };
> --
> 2.34.1
>
Reviewed-by: Lei YU <yulei.sh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
--
BRs,
Lei YU
