On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 10:58:56PM +0100, Rafał Miłecki wrote: > On 23.12.2021 22:18, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Thu, Dec 23, 2021 at 7:08 AM Rafał Miłecki <zajec5@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > From: Rafał Miłecki <rafal@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Not every NVMEM has predefined cells at hardcoded addresses. Some > > > devices store cells in internal structs and custom formats. Referencing > > > such cells is still required to let other bindings use them. > > > > > > Modify binding to require "reg" xor "label". The later one can be used > > > to match "dynamic" NVMEM cells by their names. > > > > 'label' is supposed to correspond to a sticker on a port or something > > human identifiable. It generally should be something optional to > > making the OS functional. Yes, there are already some abuses of that, > > but this case is too far for me. > > Good to learn that! > > "name" is special & not allowed I think. It's the node name essentially. Why is using node names not sufficient? Do you have some specific examples? Rob
