On 21/12/2021 14:15:46+0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > Add i.MX8QM rtc compatible to the SCU bindings documentation. > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxx> > --- > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/fsl,scu.txt | 4 +++- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/fsl,scu.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/fsl,scu.txt > index f1470d562156..4633be2182dd 100644 > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/fsl,scu.txt > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/arm/freescale/fsl,scu.txt > @@ -134,7 +134,9 @@ RTC bindings based on SCU Message Protocol > ------------------------------------------------------------ > > Required properties: > -- compatible: should be "fsl,imx8qxp-sc-rtc"; > +- compatible: Should be one of: > + "fsl,imx8qm-sc-rtc", > + "fsl,imx8qxp-sc-rtc". Are the imx8qm and imx8qxp SCU actually different? I would hope you won't had a third messaging protocol for the RTC... -- Alexandre Belloni, co-owner and COO, Bootlin Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering https://bootlin.com
