On 21-12-17 17:59:26, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > On Thu, Dec 16, 2021 at 08:48:14PM +0200, Abel Vesa wrote: > > Add i.MX8DXL lpuart compatible to the bindings documentation. > > > > Signed-off-by: Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@xxxxxxx> > > --- > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml | 4 ++++ > > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml > > index fa23c60a01d0..ee37aa125c86 100644 > > --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/serial/fsl-lpuart.yaml > > @@ -29,6 +29,10 @@ properties: > > - items: > > - const: fsl,imx8qm-lpuart > > - const: fsl,imx8qxp-lpuart > > + - items: > > + - const: fsl,imx8dxl-lpuart > > + - const: fsl,imx8qxp-lpuart > > + - const: fsl,imx7ulp-lpuart > > Why is "- items:" listed twice here? There are actually 3 "- items:" and there is a "oneOf:" that encloses all of these. Unfortunately, there are special cases within the driver that forces the devicetree nodes to have a different list of compatibles for almost each SoC. > > thanks, > > greg k-h
