On Tuesday 26 August 2014 12:20:13 Thierry Reding wrote: > On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 11:54:43AM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > I'm not sure if it's really worth it. One thing we might do is just > > remove all definitions of ioremap_nocache and add a wrapper to > > include/linux/io.h, to make it more obvious what is going on. > > Yes, I suppose that would work too. I still think there's an advantage > in being explicit and avoid aliases like this. Perhaps a __deprecated > annotation would help with that? I fear adding __deprecated would be too controversial, because that would add hundreds of new warnings to code that is not actually wrong. Arnd -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
