Hi! > >> Would you elaborate? > >> > >> If I have a device like a phone, I may want to put one "slot" inside > >> phone for basic system, and offer second slot for user expansion > >> (initially empty). > > > > if multiple slot is supported, then a mmcqd should be processing for multiple slots. > > It's too inefficient, and affect the whole performance reduction. > Sorry, Discard this comment. it means dwmci, not mmcqd. Well, that's a Linux problem, and for many applications, not even problem at all. Device tree should describe hardware, and hardware can do multiple slots per controller, so device tree should describe multiple slots per controller. Now, the configuration may be uncommon, but you are moving from good hardware description to bad hardware description. Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
